2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of sexual variation in Indian femur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean femoral length of Ghanaian males and the mean reported for Indians [9]. Unlike males, there was a statistically significant lower difference between the mean femoral length of Ghanaian females and means reported for South African Whites and Indians [8,9]. Again, these differences could result from the differences in ethnicity and race which have been shown to contribute immensely to interpopulation variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean femoral length of Ghanaian males and the mean reported for Indians [9]. Unlike males, there was a statistically significant lower difference between the mean femoral length of Ghanaian females and means reported for South African Whites and Indians [8,9]. Again, these differences could result from the differences in ethnicity and race which have been shown to contribute immensely to interpopulation variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The mean femoral length of Ghanaian males differed significantly (p < 0.05) from that reported for South African Whites [8] and the mean femoral length of Ghanaian females also differed significantly from the means reported for South African Whites and Indians [8,9]. These differences could result from the differences in race, nutritional status and occupation which all have been shown to contribute significantly to inter-population variation [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most valuable variable was EB, but it was not determined that breadth-related variables were better discriminators than length-related variables. However, in studies of South African [3], German [13], and Indian [18] populations, breadth-related variables were better discriminators than length-related variables. Iscan and Shihai [7] supported the findings of earlier studies indicating that breadth and circumference measurements of long bones are often more sexually dimorphic than linear dimensions such as length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, many authors [2,4,6,7,12,13,[18][19][20][21] did not report uniform values for all races studied in different populations. Anthropometric dimensions vary among populations, even in subjects on the same continent, and these variations are attributed to genetic and environmental factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%