2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-020-09928-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of short-term spatiotemporal clustering features of Greek seismicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the productivity parameter, α, was estimated equal to α = 1.78, indicating also Mainshock-Aftershock type of sequence, since Mainshock-Aftershock activity is typically characterized by α values ranging between [1.3-3.1], whereas swarm-like activity is ascribed to values ranging between [0.35-0.85] (Hainzl and Ogata, 2005;Ogata, 1992). The parameters expressing temporal characteristics, c and p, attain expected values, in comparison with those reported in previous studies ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 and from 1.16 to 1.25, respectively (Chu et al, 2011;Kourouklas et al, 2020).…”
Section: Temporal Features From the Etas Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Furthermore, the productivity parameter, α, was estimated equal to α = 1.78, indicating also Mainshock-Aftershock type of sequence, since Mainshock-Aftershock activity is typically characterized by α values ranging between [1.3-3.1], whereas swarm-like activity is ascribed to values ranging between [0.35-0.85] (Hainzl and Ogata, 2005;Ogata, 1992). The parameters expressing temporal characteristics, c and p, attain expected values, in comparison with those reported in previous studies ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 and from 1.16 to 1.25, respectively (Chu et al, 2011;Kourouklas et al, 2020).…”
Section: Temporal Features From the Etas Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…This study revealed that the joint implementation of physics-based approaches and the statistical ETAS model is beneficial for future OEF systems. Kourouklas et al (2020) Mangira et al (2020), revealing that the employed ETAS clustering model provides reliable forecasts of the aftershock activity for this region.…”
Section: Region Of Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to the study by 17 , the ETAS model is the best model for describing short-term seismicity (see also 18 ). The ETAS model performed quite well in prospectively forecasting the seismicity within various operational frameworks in California, Greece, Italy, Japan, Spain, New Zealand, and Iceland 6,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] . It has been employed for time-dependent seismic hazard 8,24,32,34,35 , and risk and loss forecasting 8,34,[36][37][38][39] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%