1970
DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(70)90037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the late form (type Lundborg) of progressive myoclonic epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial descriptions of LD highlighted a tight range of age at onset in adolescence with a rapid and predictable decline to death (Van Heycop Ten Ham, 1975). Rare cases with late onset or a longer course were identified (Kraus‐Ruppert et al, 1970). Molecular studies have now revealed a total of >50 different mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B (Ianzano et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial descriptions of LD highlighted a tight range of age at onset in adolescence with a rapid and predictable decline to death (Van Heycop Ten Ham, 1975). Rare cases with late onset or a longer course were identified (Kraus‐Ruppert et al, 1970). Molecular studies have now revealed a total of >50 different mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B (Ianzano et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jakob [19] and Kraus-Ruppert et al [22] described two brothers FD and ED. FD presented with a generalized epileptic attack at age 20 and developed myoclonic attacks soon after.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining cases, the atypical ones, defectively known or too few in number, should simply be lumped together until experience and knowledge have grown sufficiently for the separation of some new entity. In that group we would lump our "atypical" female patient described on p. 389, the brothers reported as Lundborg's type by Vogel et al (1965) and later described in detail by Kraus-Ruppert et al (1970), the patient of Dastur et al (1966), referred to by Diebold (1972) as a late type of the Lafora group, and the patients of Riehl et al (1967 andBrown et al 1 9 6 Q Klein et al (1968) and Bergener & Gerhard (1970). These patients were atypical not only in clinical features but also, as far as we can judge, regarding histological data (Haltia, personal communication 1978).…”
Section: Nosological Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%