2007
DOI: 10.1080/00137910701328888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Quality–Productivity Relationship and its Verification in Manufacturing Industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is absolutely unrealistic for a wide range of manufacturing systems where the production process is subject to quality deterioration (Rivera-Gomez et al, 2013a). In addition, while several studies have shown the strong interdependencies between quality, maintenance and productivity (Ben-Daya and Duffuaa, 1995;Lee et al, 2007;Colledani and Tolio, 2009;Rotab Khan and Darrab, 2010), almost all of the existing CSP-1 models do not consider any interactions with production, inventory and maintenance aspects. An exception is Cao and Subramanian (2013), who provided an analytical framework to evaluate the effects of the CSP-1 design parameters on the Work-In-Progress (WIP) inventory and manufacturing throughput.…”
Section: S Model Considering An Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is absolutely unrealistic for a wide range of manufacturing systems where the production process is subject to quality deterioration (Rivera-Gomez et al, 2013a). In addition, while several studies have shown the strong interdependencies between quality, maintenance and productivity (Ben-Daya and Duffuaa, 1995;Lee et al, 2007;Colledani and Tolio, 2009;Rotab Khan and Darrab, 2010), almost all of the existing CSP-1 models do not consider any interactions with production, inventory and maintenance aspects. An exception is Cao and Subramanian (2013), who provided an analytical framework to evaluate the effects of the CSP-1 design parameters on the Work-In-Progress (WIP) inventory and manufacturing throughput.…”
Section: S Model Considering An Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste trabalho, para aferir o desempenho organizacional foram escolhidas as variáveis qualidade e produtividade, próprias do ambiente de manufatura, alvo deste estudo. Medidas de qualidade e produtividade permitem maior generalização e possibilidade de comparação considerando tratar-se de empresas fabris (Shingo, 1996;Paladini, 1990;Lee et al, 2007). Tais medidas relacionam-se à perspectiva de processos internos de Kaplan e Norton (1997).…”
Section: Desempenho Empresarial: Qualidade E Produtividadeunclassified
“…Due to the emphasis on quality management in recent years, quality has become one of the key performance indicators for many industries (Gerold, 2004). Past research has demonstrated that quality is highly coupled with other quantitative performance factors such as throughput and WIP (Lee et al, 2007). It is necessary to integrate quality modeling into the analysis of manufacturing systems in order to improve both quantitative and qualitative performance simultaneously (Inman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%