2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of southern hemisphere meteor showers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meteors were associated with showers using the table of Sun-centered ecliptic shower radiant positions given in Jenniskens et al (2018). This table, which is based on CAMS data, includes radiant drift and provides numerous, scattered sets of reference parameters per shower.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meteors were associated with showers using the table of Sun-centered ecliptic shower radiant positions given in Jenniskens et al (2018). This table, which is based on CAMS data, includes radiant drift and provides numerous, scattered sets of reference parameters per shower.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listed parameters are IAUMDC's three-letter code and name, solar longitude of peak activity, radiant in J2000 reference frame and geocentric speed at peak activity, orbital elements including a, e, i, and TJ, the technique that detected the shower (O = optical, R = radar), the estimated age from § 3.1.2 (if available), and proposed parent body in the IAUMDC catalog. The data spreadsheet is available here and a Jupyter notebook that used to prepare this a The IAUMDC catalog (version 2018 November 9) listed only radar detection of this shower, but optical detection has been reported by Jenniskens et al (2018). b The IAUMDC catalog gives C/2003 Q1 (SOHO) as a likely parent, but we find no published research that proposed or discussed this linkage.…”
Section: Age-width-tj Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deployment of optical and radar network across the world (e.g. Janches et al 2015;Pokorný et al 2017;Jenniskens et al 2018;Li et al 2018) will increase the temporal coverage and orbit statistics and enhance our understanding of young streams. Another possibility is that these streams are trapped in resonances and are therefore somewhat immune against dispersion.…”
Section: Possible Biases and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…524. In the IAU MDC list, version we used, this shower was given in three modifications (Andreić et al 2013;Jenniskens et al 2016aJenniskens et al , 2018. The mean geophysical parameters of these modifications are given in Table 3 and mean orbits in Table 4.…”
Section: Identification Of Real Shower In the Iau MDC Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have attempted to work out or improve a method of prediction of particular shower, often on the basis of known parent body (Koten & Vaubaillon 2015;Ryabova 2016;Sugar et al 2017;Vaubaillon 2017;Ryabova & Rendtel 2018a,b). All this effort is highly desirable in the current era when a number of new showers as well as a number of new members of known showers are reported every year (e.g., Jones 2018;Jenniskens et al 2018;Koukal 2018;Molau et al 2018a,b,c;Shiba et al 2018;Toth et al 2018;Vida et al 2018a,b;Wisniewski et al 2018, if we consider only the last year).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%