A Survey on Group Key Agreement Protocols in Cloud Environment

Li, Meng; Zhang, Ruijie; Du, Xiuli; Zhou, Min; Yan, Luqi; Song, Jian

doi:10.1109/ic3.2018.00-38

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[36], [37], [38]. There are several group key schemas, such as dynamic, static, or triple-party key agreement protocols, depending on the deployed system and service [26].…”

Section: Group Key Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Identity and Access Management for Cross-Domain Dynamic Users: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access control management in a heterogeneous cloud environment, where the number of users is growing, is a daunting task for service providers. Efficiency is heavily reliant on shared resources in a modern cloud computing culture. Although data or service sharing is highly appreciated for collaborative projects, preserving identity and access management security is challenging in this context. The difficulties encountered are diverse, including a single point of failure, incompatibility, dynamic user groups, trust establishment, and revocation. Despite extensive research, certain obstacles and issues need to be addressed. In this article, challenges in access management in centralized and decentralized identity governance are grouped into different categories and accompanied by background information on the topic. Studies and implemented projects have been evaluated regarding their value and flaws. Traditional approaches, such as centralized and federated identity, as well as more futuristic methods, such as blockchain-based decentralized identity, AI/ML access management, and ABE schema, have been investigated while writing this paper. A comparative evaluation of the proposed studies has been included, where the differences and similarities can be observed.

show abstract

“…[36], [37], [38]. There are several group key schemas, such as dynamic, static, or triple-party key agreement protocols, depending on the deployed system and service [26].…”

Section: Group Key Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Identity and Access Management for Cross-Domain Dynamic Users: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is no need to exchange information back and forth, in this way, the protocol does not require a public-key certificate foundation, nor does it have the problem of key escrow. Li et al 17,18 studied the GKA in the cloud environment. There is a risk of unreliable communication in wireless networks, and there is a risk of losing important data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group key agreement protocol among terminals of the intelligent information system for mobile edge computing

Zhang

Zhu

Wang

et al. 2021

Int J of Intelligent Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security communication and information sharing among mobile devices are important application technologies of the intelligent information system (IIS). Because IIS is vulnerable to attacks, so the security of information sharing among mobile devices is seriously threatened. Thence, it is necessary to establish a secure channel for communication among mobile devices of IIS over an opening network. Group key agreement (GKA) can establish a secure channel among mobile devices of IIS by encryption technology. Due to the resource‐constraints of mobile devices, such as weak computing power, small storage capacity, and limited communication range. To address these issues, an asymmetric GKA protocol among terminals of IIS for mobile edge computing (GKA–IIS–MEC) network is proposed in this paper. Adopted asymmetric GKA to achieve the group secure communication mechanisms that message sender unfettered in this protocol; the protocol also uses edge computing environment to migrate the computation and communication loads of mobile devices of IIS to edge nodes, thereby ensuring that mobile devices have lightweight computation and communication loads; and the members participating in the GKA can verify whether the group session keys they calculated are correctness. Under the hardness assumption of bilinear inverse Diffie–Hellman problem, the proposed protocol is proven that it can resist negative attacks. After evaluating the performance of the protocol, GKA–IIS–MEC has higher efficiency than the referred works in terms of time cost, communication consumption, and computation consumption.

show abstract

A Survey on Group Key Agreement Protocols in Cloud Environment

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

A Survey on Identity and Access Management for Cross-Domain Dynamic Users: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges

A Survey on Identity and Access Management for Cross-Domain Dynamic Users: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges

Group key agreement protocol among terminals of the intelligent information system for mobile edge computing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About