A Sustainable Integration Model (SIM) for Construction Project Management

Hasnain, Wajeeha; Pasha, Dr. Urooj

doi:10.33152/jmphss-6.1.6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Co-responsibility can be expressed in a document signed by the parties, as is the case of agreements between organizations and sectors, but it can also be observed in the self-regulation of consumption, the reduction of subsidies, the eradication of forgiveness and the gradual increase in rates. 27 The result of co-responsibility is the governance indicated by the representation of user sectors in the boards of directors of the organizations in charge of supplying or charging electricity and water. The representativeness of the parties involved presupposes an interculturality that distinguishes ecocentric governance from anthropocentric governance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecocentric governance: sustainability between the availability of resources and needs

Carreón Guillén,

Marcos Bustos Aguayo,

Rubén Sandoval Vázquez

et al. 2022

JPNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals, the conservation of resources such as electricity and water are the central axis of the public agenda. Public policies unfold between scarcity or abundance. Intermittent supply leads to savings in users. On the other hand, the permanent availability of electricity and water encourages greater consumption. In this sense, the objective of this study was to establish the governance structure, considering five phases: conflict, negotiation, consensus, self-regulation and co-responsibility. The orientation towards the conservation of resources for the benefit of future generations versus the consumption of current generations defines the type of government. This paper establishes the differences between anthropocentric governance and ecocentric governance with respect to the management of energy and water resources and services. An exploratory, cross-sectional and psychometric study was carried out with a non-probabilistic selection of 100 officials and users of the electricity and water service. The Carreón Governance Inventory (2022) was used, and the three preponderant factors were obtained: conflict, negotiation-consensus and self-regulation-co-responsibility. In relation to the literature consulted, the three factors refer to governance oriented towards resource conservation. The third factor of self-regulation and co-responsibility suggests policies oriented by the availability of energy and water resources. Empirical testing of the model in a scenario and a sample exposed to resource scarcity is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecocentric governance: sustainability between the availability of resources and needs

Carreón Guillén,

Marcos Bustos Aguayo,

Rubén Sandoval Vázquez

et al. 2022

JPNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Navigating Kazakhstan’s Sustainable Economic Future: A Study of Tech Innovation, Infrastructure, and Resource Management

Rakhymzhan,

Dabyltayeva,

Sakhanova

et al. 2024

Economies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a quest to illuminate Kazakhstan’s economic horizon within a sustainable context, this study delved into the complex interplay of sustainable tech innovation, investment in sustainable infrastructure, and natural resource management. The study assesses the potential for green economy development by introducing the adoption of sustainable practices as the mediator and corporate social responsibility as the moderator in the examined relationships. We employed a cluster sampling technique, focusing on government sector employees in Kazakhstan. The choice of this sector stemmed from its pivotal role in shaping national policies. A time-lagged approach was incorporated, collecting data at two distinct time points to capture the dynamic evolution of green initiatives over time. As the data unfolded, sustainable tech innovation, investment in sustainable infrastructure, and natural resource management emerged as significant predictors for adopting environmentally responsible practices leading to green economy development. This development process, we found, was further augmented by the moderating influence of corporate social responsibility. Hence, our findings contribute both practical and theoretical insights to the discourse on sustainable economic development. In addressing the intricate interplay of technological, infrastructural, and resource-related factors, this study provides guidance for Kazakhstan’s ongoing transition towards a more sustainable and resilient economic trajectory.

show abstract

A Sustainable Integration Model (SIM) for Construction Project Management

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Ecocentric governance: sustainability between the availability of resources and needs

Ecocentric governance: sustainability between the availability of resources and needs

Navigating Kazakhstan’s Sustainable Economic Future: A Study of Tech Innovation, Infrastructure, and Resource Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About