2015
DOI: 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review

Abstract: The revised version of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP-II) has been used across all birth weights and gestational ages to measure the concept of severity of illness in critically ill neonates. The SNAP-II has been operationalized in various ways across research studies. This systematic review seeks to synthesize the available research regarding the utility of this instrument, specifically on the utility of measuring severity of illness sequentially and at later time points. A systematic review wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine overall illness severity, the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) was calculated as described previously,31 based on 26 physiological measurements obtained within the first 48 hours of life. We chose the original SNAP instrument because it is the most comprehensive instrument and has been shown to be a reliable and significant predictor of neonatal mortality in preterm neonates, as compared with birth weight and Apgar scores as predictors alone 31–34. Health outcomes including enteral feeding tolerance, suspect or proven NEC, and late-onset infection were observed prospectively from weekly audits of the EMR until hospital discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine overall illness severity, the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) was calculated as described previously,31 based on 26 physiological measurements obtained within the first 48 hours of life. We chose the original SNAP instrument because it is the most comprehensive instrument and has been shown to be a reliable and significant predictor of neonatal mortality in preterm neonates, as compared with birth weight and Apgar scores as predictors alone 31–34. Health outcomes including enteral feeding tolerance, suspect or proven NEC, and late-onset infection were observed prospectively from weekly audits of the EMR until hospital discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the original SNAP instrument because it is the most comprehensive instrument and has been shown to be a reliable and significant predictor of neonatal mortality in preterm neonates, as compared with birth weight and Apgar scores as predictors alone. [31][32][33][34] Health outcomes including enteral feeding tolerance, suspect or proven NEC, and late-onset infection were observed prospectively from weekly audits of the EMR until hospital discharge. Any discrepancies in the EMR were clarified with the clinical management team.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians with guidance from institutional protocols determined CRRT initiation, modality, prescription, vascular access, anticoagulation including venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTE), and termination. All patients received CVVHD with a starting prescribed clearance of 2000 ml/1.73m Illness severity is described by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (SNAP-II) score which has been validated in critically ill neonates both at admission and sequentially to predict mortality risk due to physiologic instability [19]. SNAP-II score is a summative score out of 115 and based on mean arterial pressure, temperature, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen, lowest pH, seizures, and urine output [19].…”
Section: Page 4/23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients received CVVHD with a starting prescribed clearance of 2000 ml/1.73m Illness severity is described by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (SNAP-II) score which has been validated in critically ill neonates both at admission and sequentially to predict mortality risk due to physiologic instability [19]. SNAP-II score is a summative score out of 115 and based on mean arterial pressure, temperature, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen, lowest pH, seizures, and urine output [19]. SNAP-II scores greater than 30 suggest a 3.5 times increased risk of mortality [19].…”
Section: Page 4/23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation