A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Value of Galectin-3 in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We investigated the potential diagnostic role of galectin-3 (Gal-3) in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: We searched PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception until 20 June 2024. We measured effect sizes using odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) with CIs for continuous data. Random synthesis analysis was performed if I2 was less than 50% or Q test p values were less than 0.05. Otherwise, a fixed pooled meta-analysis was performed. Results: The meta-analysis includes 15 eligible studies. Gal-3 levels were substantially higher in the ACS group (12.84 ± 8.48 ng/mL) compared to the control group (7.23 ± 6.05 ng/mL; MD = 3.89; 95% CI: 2.83 to 4.95; p < 0.001). Gal-3 levels in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and control groups differed (10.09 ± 8.16 vs. 4.64 ± 3.07 ng/mL, MD = 4.30; 95% CI: 0.41 to 8.18; p < 0.001). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in Gal-3 levels between ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and control groups (10.62 ± 7.34 vs. 5.54 ± 2.96 ng/mL; MD = 5.54; 95% CI: 3.12 to 7.97; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) vs. control groups or patients with STEMI vs. patients with NSTEMI. Conclusions: Gal-3 may be beneficial for detecting acute coronary syndromes but not NSTEMI or differentiating between ACS types. This meta-analysis is promising, but further research is needed to prove Gal-3’s potential diagnostic value, exact cut-offs, and advantages over cardiospecific troponins. Gal-3 may be a useful diagnostic biomarker; however, more clinical trials are needed to prove its utility.