A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques

Thoma, Daniel S.; Benić, Goran I.; Zwahlen, Marcel; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.; Jung, Ronald E.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x

Cited by 229 publications

(242 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

226

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Soft tissue grafts are also advised to create a favorable environment for periimplant mucosa (1). Soft tissue grafts may be harvested from the palate, retromolar pads or edentulous sites.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Biological Behavior of Mucograft® in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mucograft® is a resorbing porcine matrix composed of type I and type III collagen, used for soft tissue augmentation in guided tissue bony regeneration procedures. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of Mucograft® in human gingival fibroblasts, as well as the ability of the matrix to induce production of extracellular matrix. Six resorbing Mucograft® matrices (MCG) were cut into 3 x 2 mm rectangles and 5 x 5 mm squares and were placed in 96-and 24-well plates, respectively. The control group (CTRL) consisted of cells plated on polystyrene without the MCG. After one, two, three and seven days, cell proliferation and viability were assessed using the Trypan exclusion method and MTT test, respectively. Type III collagen (COL 3A1) and vimentin (VIM) expression were also evaluated at 10 and 14 days, using Western blotting. Statistical analysis, using ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test, revealed that human gingival fibroblasts from MCG showed similar results (p>0.05) for proliferation and viability as the cells cultured on CTRL. After 14 days, a significant decrease in COL 3A1 expression (p<0.05) was observed when cultured with the MCG. VIM expression showed no significant difference at any time period (p>0.05). Although no increase in extracellular matrix secretion was observed in this in vitro study, Mucograft® presented cellular compatibility, being an option for a scaffold whenever it is required.

show abstract

“…Soft tissue grafts are also advised to create a favorable environment for periimplant mucosa (1). Soft tissue grafts may be harvested from the palate, retromolar pads or edentulous sites.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Biological Behavior of Mucograft® in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A similar method of excision was done in our case to prevent the further recurrence of this lesion. CTG has been documented for managing soft tissue esthetics, for increasing the thickness of the soft tissue [6][7][8] and width of attached gingival [9]. In our case, the excision of the lesion led to a large soft tissue defect with only a minimal amount of keratinized gingiva and no attached gingiva, inorder to overcome this, a connective tissue graft was used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Esthetic Approach using Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Defect Following Surgical Excision of Gingival Fibrolipoma

Balasundaram

Parthasarathy

Kumar

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several different techniques have been described in order to cover the exposed root surface, and increase the dimensions of the keratinized tissue in gingival recession defects (Table 1). Multiple gingival augmentation techniques with different success are described in the literature [16][17][18][19]. Generally, surgical techniques are used to cover recessions with different flaps-ex.…”

Section: Surgical Therapy Of Gingival Recessionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Perspectives in the Diagnostic of Gingival Recession

Dominiak¹,

Gedrange²

2014

Adv Clin Exp Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical situation observed in patient populations regardless of their age and ethnicity. It has been estimated that over 60% of the human population has gingival recession. It is the final effect of the interaction of multiple etiological factors. Identification and definition of the range of influence is often not possible, with the result that new methods for testing and elimination of potential etiological factors are still being sought. The aim of this study is to present the etiopathogenesis of gingival recessions with regard to the analysis of morphological and functional factors. For the assessment of the bone factors, we will describe the new cephalometric method for measuring sagital width of the bone in the central incisors area, places when GR are most commonly observed. Also, a review will be presented of modern methods of treatment; in particular classes recessions; usage substitute of autogenous tissue will be emphasized -collagen matrix, and primary culture fibroblasts on collagen net (Adv Clin Exp Med 2014, 23, 6, 857-863).

show abstract

A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques

Cited by 229 publications

References 61 publications

Evaluation of the Biological Behavior of Mucograft® in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the Biological Behavior of Mucograft® in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study

A Novel Esthetic Approach using Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Defect Following Surgical Excision of Gingival Fibrolipoma

New Perspectives in the Diagnostic of Gingival Recession

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About