2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of compliance to oral nutritional supplements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
193
4
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
20
193
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many studies regarding compliance to ONS have been published so far, to our best knowledge only one systematic review has been made to summarize those studies. 11 Hubbard et al reviewed 46 studies of all types with 4,328 patients in which compliance to ONS was measured. 11 Those studies compared patients with various diseases (oncological, geriatric, respiratory, renal, and fractures) receiving supplementation in ambulatory as well as inpatient setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although many studies regarding compliance to ONS have been published so far, to our best knowledge only one systematic review has been made to summarize those studies. 11 Hubbard et al reviewed 46 studies of all types with 4,328 patients in which compliance to ONS was measured. 11 Those studies compared patients with various diseases (oncological, geriatric, respiratory, renal, and fractures) receiving supplementation in ambulatory as well as inpatient setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Hubbard et al reviewed 46 studies of all types with 4,328 patients in which compliance to ONS was measured. 11 Those studies compared patients with various diseases (oncological, geriatric, respiratory, renal, and fractures) receiving supplementation in ambulatory as well as inpatient setting. The overall compliance to prescribed ONS was 78% with most of studies (62 %) at the level of >75%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compliance értékét jelentősen befolyásolja az iható tápszer energiatartalma: a magas energiatartalmú (≥2 kcal/ml) tápszerek esetén a compliance szignifikánsan jobb, mint az ennél alacsonyabb (1,5 kcal/ml, illetve 1-1,3 kcal/ ml) energiatartalmú tápszerek esetén. Ennek nagy való-színűséggel az az oka, hogy a magasabb energiatartalmú tápszerből ugyanannyi kalória beviteléhez kevesebbet kell elfogyasztani [7]. Például napi 600 kcal tápszerrel történő beviteléhez 2 kcal/ml energiatartalmú tápszer-ből 300 ml-t, 1,5 kcal/ml energiatartalmú tápszerből 400 ml-t, 1 kcal/ml energiatartalmú tápszerből pedig 600 ml-t kell a betegnek elfogyasztania.…”
Section: Megbeszélésunclassified
“…Adherence is another critical factor in nutritional interventions. It is well known that nutritional supplements or changes to dietary intake are notoriously difficult for subjects to follow consistently (21) . All studies in this group reported adherence, but three had relatively low rates (11)(12)(13) , suggesting that a lack of adherence could be the reason for a lack of effect.…”
Section: Whole-protein Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%