2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5240-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of current methodology of high resolution pharyngeal manometry with and without impedance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nadir UES pressure, i.e., the lowest UES pressure during relaxation, was also measured. Velopharyngeal, mesopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and whole pharyngeal contractile integrals and the UES integrated relaxation pressure were analyzed using a semiautomated analysis portal (Swallow Gateway™) [25][26][27]. These pharyngoesophageal integral metrics are in line with the International High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Working Group recommendations [11]; the metrics used in this study are defined in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nadir UES pressure, i.e., the lowest UES pressure during relaxation, was also measured. Velopharyngeal, mesopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and whole pharyngeal contractile integrals and the UES integrated relaxation pressure were analyzed using a semiautomated analysis portal (Swallow Gateway™) [25][26][27]. These pharyngoesophageal integral metrics are in line with the International High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Working Group recommendations [11]; the metrics used in this study are defined in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study [ 23 ] utilised the ManoView software. This software requires correction of a system-based measurement fault [ 31 ]. The study did not state whether the correction was made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these variables can alter the pressure measurements obtained, limiting comparison of study findings [ 18 ]. Winiker et al [ 31 ] reported considerable variability in PHRM protocol and gaps in documentation of such protocol across the literature. This review reveals that studies using PHRM in PwMND are no exception to these gaps or discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from sixty swallows was exported to a semi-automated online analysis software (www.swallowgateway.com Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia). This software has been previously used to analyse HRM data (Regan, 2020;Winiker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%