2020
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2020.1713899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on bio-sequestration of carbon dioxide in bio-concrete systems: a future direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low- and high-level settings of several factors, particularly the B. tequilensis concentration (B), density of the concrete (D), temperature (T) and CO 2 concentration (CO 2 ), were input and analyzed using Minitab software (version 18, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA) and analyzed. A reasonable range for each factor was selected according to previous research findings [ 2 ], as presented in Table 3 . The next stage used to optimize the compressive strength of B-FCB by RSM analysis involved adding eight axial and two additional runs at the center points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The low- and high-level settings of several factors, particularly the B. tequilensis concentration (B), density of the concrete (D), temperature (T) and CO 2 concentration (CO 2 ), were input and analyzed using Minitab software (version 18, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA) and analyzed. A reasonable range for each factor was selected according to previous research findings [ 2 ], as presented in Table 3 . The next stage used to optimize the compressive strength of B-FCB by RSM analysis involved adding eight axial and two additional runs at the center points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the relationship between the healing of the B-FCB pores and the high level of CO 2 during curing confirms the ability of the bacteria to accelerate the CO 2 sequestration process. This can be considered a future direction for CO 2 sequestration technology [ 2 ]. The results also confirmed that the high compressive strength performance of B-FCB compared to FCB was due to the healing of B-FCB pores.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One major reason is that the MICP offers numerous ecological benefits over conventional measures. For an instance, the Portland cement is the mostly used binder for slope protection (Daraei et al 2018;Tang et al 2018); however, its manufacturing contributes to the significant emission CO 2 and SO 2 (Alshalif et al 2020). Besides, the synthetic grouts used for surface stabilization (such as polyacrylamide and phosphor-gypsum) are reported to be highly toxic (Jiang et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%