2022
DOI: 10.33093/jiwe.2022.1.2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review on Non-Functional Requirements Documentation in Agile Methodology

Abstract: This systematic literature review studies and summarizes findings of requirements documentation of non-functional requirements practiced by agile software development teams. It identifies current practices and existing gaps when agile software teams discuss and implement non-functional requirements, and the current methods used to document non-functional requirements. Our aim is to identify available evidence on current practices and gaps in documenting non-functional requirements. The review was conducted by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognize the most crucial research areas [4,32]. There are several types of research papers related to the topic that is focused on by this systematic literature review [33]. This search resulted in articles, and we collected the keywords used in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognize the most crucial research areas [4,32]. There are several types of research papers related to the topic that is focused on by this systematic literature review [33]. This search resulted in articles, and we collected the keywords used in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could enhance our software design process by integrating the semi-automated approach proposed in [19]. Additionally, we can optimize our development methodology by adopting the most effective agile practices outlined in [20]. This combined strategy will enable us to create the system with greater efficiency and precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%