2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on the engineering of software for ubiquitous systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other works (Alegre et al 2016) and (Sánchez Guinea et al 2016) are literature reviews, focusing on engineering strategies to develop Context-Aware Software Systems (CASS) and Ubiquitous Systems, respectively. In (Alegre et al 2016), the results are based on a literature review, and a survey carried out with specialists in CASS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two other works (Alegre et al 2016) and (Sánchez Guinea et al 2016) are literature reviews, focusing on engineering strategies to develop Context-Aware Software Systems (CASS) and Ubiquitous Systems, respectively. In (Alegre et al 2016), the results are based on a literature review, and a survey carried out with specialists in CASS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment of preparing this manuscript, we observed a lack of more concrete proposals for the materialization of the IoT paradigm. We aim to address the challenges presented in (Alegre et al 2016) and (Sánchez Guinea et al 2016), filling the gaps from (Patel and Cassou 2015), (Costa et al 2017) and (Aniculaesei et al 2018) focusing on the issue of multidisciplinarity and providing support to decision-making in the initial development phase of problem understanding. Figure 1 presents our investigation strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matalonga et al argue that, after analyzing the 12 studies, it did not found evidence that there is a complete context-aware test method for testing CASS. Guinea et al [28] conducted a systematic review evaluating the different phases of the software development life cycle for ubiquitous systems. The main limitations and interests of each of the phases were classified according to each phase of the development cycle.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among her publications, we can note the interest in mobile applications concerning to context modeling, quality assurance, context-sensitive systems development, context management, and so on. Konstantin Holl has published papers related to quality assurance, but nothing can be seen about the research interest of Michael Hassel due to the lack of publications.The authors of Amalfitano et al[42] are Domenico Amalfitano26 , Anna Rita Fasolino 27 , Porfirio Tramontana28 , and Nicola Amatucci 29 . Domenico Amalfitano, Anna Rita Fasolino, and Porfirio Tramontana are not only professors of the same institution (University of Naples Federico II) but also most of their articles were written together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the route to technological maturity of a product may seem straight-forward, each step can involve extensive preparations and cooperation among multiple teams. It is sensible to separate the PD process into distinct phases, which involve distinct activities (Rubin & Chisnell, 2008). To maintain an overview of the progress, a visualisation of the entire PD process can be valuable (Keller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Relevant Aspects Of Prototype Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%