A systematic review on the internationalization of Chinese SMEs: thematic expansion, new impulses and potential avenues for future research

Abstract

Purpose Supplementing an earlier review paper on the internationalization of Chinese small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (ICS) that covers the period 1991–2012, the purpose of this paper is to examine how research on this topic has thematically expanded in recent years. Specifically, the authors aim to examine the literature between 2013 and 2020, highlight advancements and synthesize potential avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach Based on the systematic literature review method (Denyer and Tranfield, 2009; Kraus et al., 2020), the authors considered more than 5,700 peer-reviewed journal articles, of which 107 were included in the narrative synthesis. Findings Research on the ICS has become more widespread and mature in the period since 2013. First, there are more papers investigating firm-level characteristics and sources of internal capabilities. Second, the state of knowledge regarding social networks and institutional contexts in the internationalization process has increased. Consequently, new knowledge exists regarding push and pull patterns and the role China’s institutional environment is playing. Third, growing interest can be noted in studying entrepreneurship in the context of Chinese SMEs’ global expansion. Additionally, the paper exposes promising areas for future research and suggests more than 20 potential research questions. Originality/value This review in the growing debate on the ICS is the first of its kind that consciously drives the work of a previous review study forward. This enables tracking the progress of research (“mapping of the field”) and identifying important avenues for future research that can further advance the debate. The comprehensive review also discovered one relatively new variable – the role of Chinese returnee entrepreneurs – which shows the significant influence on SME internationalization and attracts growing scholarly attention.

Venture Capital Financing as A Driver for Entrepreneurship Development in Africa. A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

“…Many studies explored on entrepreneurship from various standpoints such as entrepreneurship and SME development (Abu Bakar et al, 2017;Kloepfer & Castrogiovanni, 2018;Melese, 2018;Hänle et al, 2022), entrepreneurship activities (Ngoma et al, 2021;Munyuki, T. and Jonah, 2022), venture capital and SME performance (Festel et al, 2015;Shava, 2018;Couto, 2020;(Kato & Germinah, 2022), observing it as a device for employment creation and poverty alleviation in emerging economies. However, studies on how VC investment can stimulate entrepreneurship development remains scarce.…”

An Examination of the Identification and Exploitation of International Opportunities Among Chinese Traditional SMEs

“…This study concluded that AMCs, GM, and CI are essential for IOI and IOE among Chinese internationalized traditional SMEs. Aghazadeh and Zandi (2023) claimed that literature didn’t present a great consensus on true born globals, instead, it has introduced the emergence of early and fast internationalization patterns such as “global new venture,”“born international” and “born again regional.” In their systematic review on the internationalization of Chinese SMEs, Hänle et al (2022) found that a growing internationalization research stream starting from 2013 and onward has focused on investigating the global expansion of SMEs with emphasis on the role of firm-level characteristics, sources of internal capabilities and social networks. Our study reported that the internal capabilities possessed by SMEs’ managers: AMCs, GM, and CI were closely related to effective identification and exploitation of international opportunities.…”

Harmonizing multi-dimensional events that characterize tech start-up emergence in emerging economies: a systematic review

“…We approach our study by deploying a concept-centric systematic literature review as recommended by some scholars (Levy and Ellis, 2006; Webster and Watson, 2002; Rowe, 2014; Paré et al , 2017; Okoli, 2015; Schryen, 2013). A systematic literature review provides detailed steps, identifying, analysing, evaluating and interpreting prior relevant studies in a given area of interest (Castro and Zermeño, 2020; Chan and Mustafa, 2020; Ahmad and Bajwa, 2021; Aldairany et al , 2018; Aljuwaiber, 2020; Hänle et al , 2021; Khan et al , 2022; Sharma, 2018; Santisteban and Mauricio, 2017; Claire et al , 2019; Yamamura and Lassalle, 2022; Bansal et al , 2020). Consequently, it provides a rigorous process, free of biases and the credible outcome needed by researchers as a foundation for advancing knowledge (Webster and Watson, 2002; Okoli, 2015; Mahdavi, 2011).…”