A Taxonomy of Privacy

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Pennsylvania Law Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to University of Pennsylvania Law Review. ARTICLESPrivacy is a concept in disarray. Nobody can articulate what it means. As one commentator has observed, privacy suffers from "an embarrassment of + Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D. Yale. A project such as thisone that attempts a taxonomy of the sprawling and complex concept of privacycannot be created by one individual alone. I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to many people who provided helpful comments on the manuscript or parts thereof at various stages in its development: Thanks to Michael Weisberg and Brian Leiter for directing me to useful resources on systematics. I would also like to thank my research assistants, Poornima Ravishankar, Jessica Kahn, and Tiffany Stedman for their excellent assistance. Additionally, I benefited from helpful comments when I presented this paper at a workshop at Washington University and at a conference sponsored by the International Association of Privacy Professionals. The George Washington University School of Law scholarship fund provided generous support for this Article.) This content downloaded from 195.235.144.193 on Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:34:47 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 154: 477meanings. " Privacy is far too vague a concept to guide adjudication and lawmaking, as abstract incantations of the importance of "privacy" do not fare well when pitted against more concretely stated countervailing interests.In I960, the famous torts scholar William Prosser attempted to make sense of the landscape of privacy law by identifying four different interests. But Prosser focused only on tort law, and the law of information privacy is significantly more vast and complex, extending to Fourth Amendment law, the constitutional right to information privacy, evidentiary privileges, dozens of federal privacy statutes, and hundreds of state statutes. Moreover, Prosser wrote over 40 years ago, and new technologies have given rise to a panoply of new privacy harms.A new taxonomy to understand privacy violations is thus sorely needed. This Article develops a taxonomy to identify privacy problems in a comprehensive and concrete manner. It endeavors to guide the law toward a more coherent understanding of privacy and to serve as a framework for the future development of the field of privacy law.

Is It Harmful? Re-examining Privacy Concerns

“…To create the new scale, we applied the privacy harms framework defined by Solove [48]. We developed the 48 items scale derived from Solove's 16 privacy harms.…”

“…The primary contribution of this research is a novel instrument to measure privacy attitudes, Privacy Harms Concerns (PHC) scale. Following the recommendation of the past research [28], we used privacy harms identified by Daniel Solove as a foundation for the scale's development [48] (Table 1). The goal of this research was to identify how people perceive privacy concerns relevant to harms (to ensure consistency labeled privacy concerns throughout the article).…”

Privacy Protection for a Secure u-City Life

“…It does not have specific or definite legal connotation [4] and as such the concept of 'privacy' can be too broad. Thus, this paper will focus on the information privacy related to protection of personal information.…”

Opening up Smart Cities: Citizen-Centric Challenges and Opportunities from GIScience

“…Janssen et al [9] mention the unclear trade-off between transparency and privacy values as one of the adoption barriers of open data (and consequently of all benefits associated with the use of open data to make the city smarter). Solove [65] discussed the concept of privacy in detail and pointed out that it covers many aspects. Particularly relevant to the current discussion are:…”