A Technique in Information Retrieval and Bibliometrics to Check the Reliability of an Article Indexing

Achsan, Harry Tursulistyono Yani; Suhartanto, Heru; Wibowo, Wahyu Catur

doi:10.1109/ic3i46837.2019.9055651

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers or institutions use citation counts to measure the impact of publications from the author's perspective [11] and evaluate the quality or impact of published research [21]. It is often taken for granted today that citations measure scientific impact and scientific quality in some way [22]- [24]. Citations are increasingly being used in research policy and the research system as performance indicators [25], [26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of Dimensions and Scopus bibliographic data sources: an approach to university research productivity

Kulkanjanapiban

Silwattananusarn

2022

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>This paper shows a significant comparison of two primary bibliographic data sources at the document level of Scopus and Dimensions. The emphasis is on the differences in their document coverage by institution level of aggregation. The main objective is to assess whether Dimensions offers at the institutional level good new possibilities for bibliometric analysis as at the global level. The results of a comparative study of the citation count profiles of articles published by faculty members of Prince of Songkla University (PSU) in Dimensions and Scopus from the year the databases first included PSU-authored papers (1970 and 1978, respectively) through the end of June 2020. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis of 19,846 articles indexed in Dimensions and 13,577 indexed in Scopus. The main finding was that the number of citations received by Dimensions was highly correlated with citation counts in Scopus. Spearman’s correlation between citation counts in Dimensions and Scopus was a high and mighty relationship. The findings mainly affect Dimensions’ possibilities as instruments for carrying out bibliometric analysis of university members’ research productivity. University researchers can use Dimensions to retrieve information, and the design policies can be used to evaluate research using <br />scientific databases.</p>

show abstract