2012
DOI: 10.1785/0120100262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Terrain-Based Site-Conditions Map of California with Implications for the Contiguous United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition. types into 16 categories, which were then linked by Yong et al (2012) to log-average V S30 values within the categories using data from California. Figure 6 shows the ranges of V S30 provided by Wald and Allen (2007) as a function of the 30 arcsec gradient, along with the data from the Hellenic PDB.…”
Section: Proxy-based V S30 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition. types into 16 categories, which were then linked by Yong et al (2012) to log-average V S30 values within the categories using data from California. Figure 6 shows the ranges of V S30 provided by Wald and Allen (2007) as a function of the 30 arcsec gradient, along with the data from the Hellenic PDB.…”
Section: Proxy-based V S30 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it is necessary to estimate V S30 for sites lacking such data, given currently available proxy relationships (including those in this paper), there are three options for sites in Greece: (1) the gradient-based approach of Wald and Allen (2007), (2) the terrain-based approach of Yong et al (2012) with the updated category means shown in Figure 5, and (3) the geology and gradient proxy presented in the previous section.…”
Section: Implementation Proxies and Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iwahashi et al [46] presented a correlation between V S30 measurements and several topographic parameters, including topographic heights, slope gradient, local convexity, and surface texture. Other authors have proposed different approaches based on geomorphological units [47], geotechnical categories [48] and geological units [49][50][51], as a proxy for V S30 assessment. More recently, Thompson et al [52] proposed a V S30 map for California, United States, using a hybrid geostatistical approach to account for geology, topography, and site-specific shear wave velocity measurements.…”
Section: Assessment Of Seismic Site Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this limitation, other data such as geological data, and measured V S30 data can be used jointly in V S30 calculation. In the early years of the twenty-first century, scientists studied the correlation between V S30 and other data such as surficial geology (e.g., Romero and Rix, 2001;Wills and Clahan, 2006); topographic slope (e.g., Wald and Allen, 2007;Allen and Wald, 2009); geomorphologic terrain mapping from satellite imagery (e.g., Yong et al, 2008;Yong et al, 2012). These studies tried to create more accurate and precise V S30 maps from the available data, then estimated the potential amplification due to site conditions in the affected or potentially affected area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%