2019
DOI: 10.1137/17m115205x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two Field Iterated Asymptotic-Preserving Method for Highly Anisotropic Elliptic Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, the targeted anisotropy strength (ε = 10 −8 ) is selected and refined meshes will be used to proceed with the comparisons of the different methods. The Duality Based formulation (8)(9), the Micro Macro formulation (16) and the Two Field Iterated formulation (13)(14) are compared against the discretized Singular Perturbation problem. The precision of the approximation carried out by the different methods is plotted on Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Precision And Computational Efficiency Of The Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To this end, the targeted anisotropy strength (ε = 10 −8 ) is selected and refined meshes will be used to proceed with the comparisons of the different methods. The Duality Based formulation (8)(9), the Micro Macro formulation (16) and the Two Field Iterated formulation (13)(14) are compared against the discretized Singular Perturbation problem. The precision of the approximation carried out by the different methods is plotted on Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Precision And Computational Efficiency Of The Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational times are given relative to those of the Singular Perturbation problem. The Duality Based scheme is less than twice as expensive as the discretized Singular Perturbation scheme (8)(9), the Micro Macro method (16) and the Two Field Iterated scheme (13)(14). The computation time is relative to that of the SP problem resolution.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Precision And Computational Efficiency Of The Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations