2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified approach to adaptive radar processing with general antenna array configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a DOA-dependent scale factor according to (39) can be considered to compensate the difference between the measured bistatic range and the required monostatic value for the correct application of ( 27) or ( 28) and (30). However, it is easy to see that:…”
Section: Frame To Frame Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a DOA-dependent scale factor according to (39) can be considered to compensate the difference between the measured bistatic range and the required monostatic value for the correct application of ( 27) or ( 28) and (30). However, it is easy to see that:…”
Section: Frame To Frame Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in Figure 5 (solid line), the array pattern obtained by weighting the signals received by the antennas of the selected configuration according to (16), for 0 = 120 ∘ , is represented, assuming that the disturbance covariance matrix M, but for a multiplicative constant, is given by…”
Section: Optimum Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is quite appropriate in the PCL case given that the level of both the direct signal and its multipath reflections is well above that of the useful signal. After combining the received signals according to (16), an adaptive temporal cancellation might be performed only to cancel disturbance residuals not adequately suppressed by the spatial adaptive filter. Then, the standard 2D (range-Doppler) crosscorrelation function (2D-CCF) is evaluated, and a proper constant false alarm rate (CFAR) threshold is applied to obtain a detection map.…”
Section: Optimum Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are forced to achieve the quiescent design pattern in the absence of interference. The filters are mismatched optimum detector (MOD) filter [25,26] and a generalized side-lobe canceller (GSLC) filter [27,28].…”
Section: Adaptive Techniques For Spsd Based Thinned Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%