2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-018-2249-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified electromechanical finite element dynamic analysis of multiple segmented smart plate energy harvesters: circuit connection patterns

Abstract: This paper presents the techniques for formulating the multiple segmented smart plate structures with different circuit connection patterns using the electromechanical finite element dynamic analysis. There are three major contributions in the proposed numerical studies. First, the electromechanical discretization has been developed for generalizing the coupled system of the Kirchhoff's smart plate structures with circuit connection patterns. Such constitutive numerical models reduced from the extended Lagrang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-uniform distribution of electric field can be observed, especially at the region near the top and bottom edge of the beam, which yields high electric field gradient and consequently induces deformation. Note that the considered flexoelectric beams do not account for the resistive load [10] or the rectifying circuit [77,78]. In [77], a piezoelectric structure is analyzed along with its circuit connections.…”
Section: Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-uniform distribution of electric field can be observed, especially at the region near the top and bottom edge of the beam, which yields high electric field gradient and consequently induces deformation. Note that the considered flexoelectric beams do not account for the resistive load [10] or the rectifying circuit [77,78]. In [77], a piezoelectric structure is analyzed along with its circuit connections.…”
Section: Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the considered flexoelectric beams do not account for the resistive load [10] or the rectifying circuit [77,78]. In [77], a piezoelectric structure is analyzed along with its circuit connections. In addition, in [78], comparisons between the charge type Hamiltonian and voltage type Hamiltonian are performed to identify the output power and voltage of the piezoelectric energy harvester.…”
Section: Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first complex natural vibration frequency, for instance, the difference between the results obtained using the finite-element mesh with 510 nodal unknowns and 5678 nodal unknowns for the real part was 0.8% and for the imaginary part was 20.5%. The difference between the results obtained using the finite-element mesh with 5678 nodal unknowns and 13323 nodal unknowns for the real part was 0.09% and for the imaginary part was 3.7% As mentioned earlier, the ANSYS package has the possibility for specifying damping proportional to the full stiffness matrix with the aid of the coefficients g or m p (25). This damping can be considered as a particular case for the model of linear viscoelasticity, which is described by complex dynamic moduli, when the shear and bulk components of the complex dynamic modulus satisfy the following condition G Tables 1 and 2 present the results of the calculations of the natural vibration frequencies for the first five eigenfrequencies of the structure with the piezoelectric element (Figure 4(a)), when it is operated in the open circuit mode (Table 1), and in the short circuit mode (Table 2), when the material of the plate has viscoelastic properties.…”
Section: Approbation Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where b ≡ {b m , −ρ e } denotes the generalized volume loads and t ≡ {t m , σ e } denotes the generalized surface tractions. Substituting Equations (6), (7) and (9) into Equation 11, one obtains…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of techniques for manufacturing composite laminates employing layers with multi-physics properties has led to the concept of smart laminates, in which different laminae may exhibit couplings between different physical fields, e.g., mechanical, thermal, electric, magnetic or even a combination of more than two of such fields, thus enabling the design of devices with multifunctional capabilities, besides the basic structural employment [2][3][4][5]. A remarkable example is provided by piezoelectric materials and laminates that, exploiting the coupling between the mechanical and electrical fields, may be employed in several applications of engineering or scientific interest [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%