A Value Analysis of Lean Processes in Target Value Design and Integrated Project Delivery

Nanda, Upali; Rybkowski, Zofia K.; Pati, Sipra; Nejati, Adeleh

doi:10.1177/1937586716670148

Cited by 8 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The proper focus on the value added to patients and the well-being improvements among hospital workers, created by a well-designed sustainable continuous improvement system, would certainly represent an enormous contribution to society. (Clark, Moller, & O'Brien, 2014) CS A10 N/A I3;I4 N/A (Colldén, Gremyr, Hellström, & Sporraeus, 2017) CS A17 N/A N/A N/A (Costa, Filho, Rentes, Bertani, & Mardegan, 2017) (Hwang, Hwang, & Hong, 2014) CS A2;A6;A17 T42; T29; T28; T20 N/A N/A (Improta et al, 2018) AR A1 T41;T30; T27; T1; T8 I1;I3 N/A (Lot et al, 2018) AR A4 T41; T29; T13; T4; T31; T30 I2;I3;I5 N/A (Mannon, 2014) CS A2;A3; T29; T27; T13 I1 N/A (Matt, Rauch, & Franzellin, 2015) AR A2 N/A I2;I3;I5 D3 (Mehdi & Al Bahrani, 2017) CS A11 T39; T8; T17 I1;I2;I3;I4 N/A (Miller & Chalapati, 2015) CS A4 T41; T30 I3 D1;D3 (Nanda, Rybkowski, Pati, & Nejati, 2017) CS A3 T31; T22 N/A N/A (Narayanamurthy, Gurumurthy, & Lankayil, 2018) CS A4;A14 T33; T2; T32; T49; T10 N/A N/A (Nayar, Ojha, Fetrick, & Nguyen, 2016) AR A2 T12; T44; T36 I3;I4 D5 (P. Simons et al, 2017) CS A11 T41;T30; T22; T17 N/A N/A (Pineda Dávila & Tinoco González, 2015) AR A7 T30; T4; T42 I1;I2;I4;I5 N/A (Poksinska, Fialkowska-Filipek, & Engström, 2017) (Fournier & Jobin, 2018) CS…”

Section: Discussion Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of lean in health care environments: an update of systematic reviews

Lima

Dinis‐Carvalho

Souza

et al. 2020

IJLSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Even though the implementation of lean in health care environments is relatively recent, it has been receiving a lot of attention in recent years. Partly because of the fact that it is a recent field of practise and research and partly because the number of works developed in this field has grown rapidly, it is important to frequently update the perspectives on this field of investigation. Thus, this study aims to review the implementation of lean tools and techniques applied to hospital organizational areas in a five-year period, between 2014 and 2018, complementing some of the most relevant reviews already published. The most important criteria such as tools, methods and principles, hospital areas intervened, improvements and difficulties were assessed and quantified. Design/methodology/approach As starting point for this systematic literature review (SLR), a set of selected pre-existing review publications was used to support the current study and as the ground base for the expansion of the studies about lean health care. The current study contemplated 114 articles from a five-year period between 2014 and 2018. A subset of 58 of these articles was critically assessed to understand the application of lean tools and methods in different hospital areas. Findings The thorough analysis of selected articles show a lack of works in continuous improvement approaches when compared to the application of production organization methods, visual management and diagnosing and problem-solving tools. The reported improvement results demonstrate alignment with the principles and foundations of lean philosophy, but such results are presented in isolated initiatives and without robust evidence of long-term maintenance. Moreover, this study shows an evolution in the number of articles referring to lean implementation in hospital areas, but in its great majority, such articles report isolated implementations in different areas, not spreading those for the global organization. Thus, some of the main recommendations are the need to implement studies on complete flows of patients, drugs and materials, instead of isolated initiatives and strive to promote the cultural change of hospitals through structural changes, following new visions and strategic objectives, supported by real models of continuous structural and sustained improvement. Originality/value The current study develops a new perspective of the articles published under the thematic of lean health care, published in a recent period of five years, which are not completely covered by other works. Additionally, it explicitly applied, in an innovative way, an approach that used a set of previous reviews as the starting point for this SLR. In this way, it integrates approaches and categories from different SLRs, creating a framework of analysis that can be used by future researchers. Finally, it shows the most recent implementations of lean health care, exposing the current trends, improvements and also the main gaps.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of lean in health care environments: an update of systematic reviews

Lima

Dinis‐Carvalho

Souza

et al. 2020

IJLSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nida et al (2015) stated that significant barriers are rooted in the way public owners perceive IPD. Nanda et al (2017) investigated what key stakeholders considered to be the pros & cons for improvement in using lean thinking and tools in an IPD process. Zhang et al (2012) studied the flexibility of integrated project teams, and how to build partnership and social dimensions.…”

Section: Integrated Project Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Project Delivery Methods: A Scoping Review

Engebø

Lædre

Young

et al. 2020

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding how to systemise, organise, and finance the design, construction, operation, and maintenance activities are all parameters needed to be optimised simultaneously in a Project Delivery Method. To meet the challenges of increasingly complex projects, a new class of delivery methods is emerging. These methods are often labelled “collaborative” since they seek to align the client’s interest with those of the supply chain. The purpose of this article is to present the current state-of-the-art through a review of 156 identified articles concerning Partnering, Integrated Project Delivery, Alliancing, Relational Contracting, and Relationship-Based Procurement. A framework for the methodological procedure based on the state of the art within qualitative research was elaborated and is reported on in this paper. The results show that there is a range of research on collaborative project delivery methods across the world. By analysing the study purposes, important themes generated and delineated as a) Conceptualisation, b) Implementation and experiences, c) Pros & Cons, d) Building Partnership & Social Dimensions, and e) Performance and Success. The paper provides an overview of collaborative project delivery methods identified in the realm of academic journals. Secondly, knowledge gaps have been identified by creating a summary of the body of evidence.

show abstract

“…Second, TVD turns the current design practice upside down because the designers have to (1) design based on a detailed estimate; (2) design for what is constructible; (3) work together to define the issues and produce decisions; and then design to those decisions. Finally, in TVD, solution sets are kept throughout the design process; work is carried out in pairs or a larger face-to-face group [4,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The TVD approach enables a project environment with favorable characteristics for generating value, including an emphasis on design activities, making the customer an essential participant in the process, and enhancing the customer-supplier relationship through collaborative approaches [4,5]. However, the primary measurement performed in TVD is not focused on value but TC [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, documented TVD projects generally highlight the achieved cost or schedule savings [16][17][18]; the other requirements, benefits, and value objectives are not visibly measured or documented or are minimally described [8,11]. This situation may be due to the lack (thus far) of accurate and rigorous value estimation methods [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exploring Value Generation in Target Value Design Applying a Value Analysis Model

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Target value design (TVD) is a management approach that applies target costing in the design and construction industry. TVD enables a project environment with favorable characteristics to generate value. However, because the TVD’s primary assessment is cost, target cost can be met without necessarily achieving the project’s full value. This research applies the action research approach to implement TVD in a housing project and explores the value generation of the project using a value analysis model (VAM) to study the balance between cost and value fulfillment in the product and design process. According to the results, even though the target cost was achieved, the desired value of the project was not achieved during the project design. However, there is a tendency to increase value over time to a greater extent in the product and not so much in the process. The main contributions of this study are the possibility of comparing cost and value, identifying the emphasis of product over process and cost over value throughout the TVD project. This study enhances the literature on project value generation and maximization, offering new knowledge for a better understanding of how to conduct a value analysis in combination with costing in TVD projects.

show abstract

A Value Analysis of Lean Processes in Target Value Design and Integrated Project Delivery

Abstract: While lean tools and an IPD method are preferred to traditional design-bid-build methods, the perception of different stakeholders varies and more work needs to be done to allow a truly shared decision-making model. Learning was identified as one of the biggest advantages.

Cited by 8 publications

References 9 publications

Implementation of lean in health care environments: an update of systematic reviews

Implementation of lean in health care environments: an update of systematic reviews

Collaborative Project Delivery Methods: A Scoping Review

Exploring Value Generation in Target Value Design Applying a Value Analysis Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About