2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2009.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wavelet-based freeway incident detection algorithm with adapting threshold parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning though that the first four techniques [9], [17], [18], [24], which claim to obtain DR = 100%, seem to calculate the value of DR in a different way. In particular, once an incident has been correctly detected, any potential detection failure that might follow in the next time intervals is not taken into account in the calculation of DR, for as long as the incident lasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning though that the first four techniques [9], [17], [18], [24], which claim to obtain DR = 100%, seem to calculate the value of DR in a different way. In particular, once an incident has been correctly detected, any potential detection failure that might follow in the next time intervals is not taken into account in the calculation of DR, for as long as the incident lasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeong et al [18] suggested a wavelet-based method with varying threshold parameters according to the traffic flow. Zhou et al [19] applied SVM with linear kernel.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches have been developed for traffic incident detection [9], such as the California algorithms (CA) [10], [11], probe-based methods [12], [13], the artificial intelligence based method [14], the neural network approach [15], and the wavelet-based method [16]. Among these approaches, the most well known ones are variants of the California algorithm [10], [11].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it turns out, abnormal data detection is a relatively easy problem because the difference between two traffic time series is dominated by the difference between their daily trends [42], [43], and the time series recorded from normal and abnormal sensors often have quite different trends.…”
Section: Abnormal Data Detection and Trend Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%