2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A yeast assay based on the gilthead sea bream (teleost fish) estrogen receptor β for monitoring estrogen mimics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, both E 2 and EE 2 have slightly greater binding affinity for the Esr1 subtype compared with Esr2a and Esr2b as described in previous fish studies (Gale et al, 2004;Passos et al, 2009). However, Esr binding studies performed in fish and other species generally agree that the relative binding affinity (RBA) for EE2 can be greater (range of 89-647) than E2 (100) (Denny et al, 2005;Gale et al, 2004;Passos et al, 2009;Shyu et al, 2011); therefore, it is somewhat surprising that EE2 does not produce a greater response (repression of vtgr-Luc activity) based on binding affinity alone. In addition to RBA, there are a number of other factors in play including saturation of the Esrs, differential recruitment of co-regulatory proteins, and cross-talk between the Esrs and other pathways that likely contribute to the observed results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, both E 2 and EE 2 have slightly greater binding affinity for the Esr1 subtype compared with Esr2a and Esr2b as described in previous fish studies (Gale et al, 2004;Passos et al, 2009). However, Esr binding studies performed in fish and other species generally agree that the relative binding affinity (RBA) for EE2 can be greater (range of 89-647) than E2 (100) (Denny et al, 2005;Gale et al, 2004;Passos et al, 2009;Shyu et al, 2011); therefore, it is somewhat surprising that EE2 does not produce a greater response (repression of vtgr-Luc activity) based on binding affinity alone. In addition to RBA, there are a number of other factors in play including saturation of the Esrs, differential recruitment of co-regulatory proteins, and cross-talk between the Esrs and other pathways that likely contribute to the observed results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In contrast, the exposure of goldfish scales to E 2 upregulated both transcripts [37], and PCB 118 upregulated cathepsin K, TRAP and RANKL [92]. Several of these contaminants have previously been shown or predicted to bind and/or activate fish ERs (e.g., [87,93,94,95]), suggesting that part of the effect of these EDCs is via a direct action on intracellular ER expression in fish scales.…”
Section: Estrogenic Endocrine Disruption In Mineralized Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many EDCs already have identified disruptive actions on fish reproductive tissues and bind and/or transactivate fish ERs (e.g., [16,78,87,94,99,100,101,102,103]), and together, these may be good starting candidates to investigate the impact of EDCs in fish mineralized tissues.…”
Section: Estrogenic Endocrine Disruption In Mineralized Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yeast is transfected with an expression vector encoding an ER and a reporter gene vector composed of an estrogen-sensitive promoter. Reporter gene assays using recombinant yeast cells is a rapid screening alternative to live animal or cell cultures studies (Passos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%