Abating endosulfan from runoff using vegetative filter strips: the importance of plant species and flow rate

Mersie, Wondimagegnehu; Seybold, Cathy A.; McNamee, Clyde; Lawson, Mandy

doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00035-5

Cited by 55 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Saturated hydrologic conditions have been reported as the key factor for such low percent retention. Maximum runoff volume retention is 100% as reported by Parsons et al (1994), Arora et al (1996), Barfield et al (1998), Boyd et al (2003), Mersie et al (2003), and Blanco-Canqui et al (2004b) under both natural and simulated rainfall ⁄ runoff experimental setups. The authors of these studies have concluded that such high percent infiltration occurs during dry antecedent moisture conditions accompanied by a low flow rate and ⁄ or volume of runoff from source areas.…”

Section: Arora Mickelson Helmers and Bakersupporting

confidence: 62%

“…ARORA, MICKELSON, HELMERS, AND BAKER ARORA, MICKELSON, HELMERS, AND BAKER ARORA, MICKELSON, HELMERS, AND BAKER (Antonious and Byers, 1997;Patty et al, 1997;Antonious, 1999;Boyd et al, 2003;Antonious, 2004;Syversen, 2005; eight pesticides). The model calculated average is lower when compared with the simulated studies which averaged 78% (Rohde et al, 1980;Kloppel et al, 1997;Schmitt et al, 1999;Arora et al, 2003;Mersie et al, 2003; five pesticides). The overall average for both natural and simulated studies averaged 76% retention (10 pesticides) by buffer strips.…”

Section: Estimating Average Pesticide Mass Retention (%) In Buffer Stmentioning

confidence: 62%

“…Natural rainfall studies showed an average of 50% runoff volume retention (Hall et al, 1983;Parsons et al, 1994;Arora et al, 1996;Webster and Shaw, 1996;Patty et al, 1997;Tingle et al, 1998;Mendez et al, 1999;Munoz-Carpena et al, 1999;Sheridan et al, 1999;Rankins et al, 2001;Hoffman and Dozier, 2002;Boyd et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2003;Helmers et al, 2005;Vianello et al, 2005). The simulated runoff studies showed an average of 38% runoff volume retention (Asmussen et al, 1977;Brockway, 1977;Hayes et al, 1984;Dillaha et al, 1988Dillaha et al, , 1989Magette et al, 1989;Coyne et al, 1995;Misra et al, 1996;Thom and Blevins, 1996;Van Dijk et al, 1996;Barfield et al, 1998; Tingle et al, 1998;Mersie et al, 1999Mersie et al, , 2003Schmitt et al, 1999;Gilley et al, 2000;Melville and Morgan, 2001;Seybold et al, 2001;Arora et al, 2003;Ludovice et al, 2003;Mickelson et al, 2003;Blanco-Canqui et al, 2004a,b;Helmers et al, 2005;Vianello et al, 2005). This a...…”

Section: Arora Mickelson Helmers and Bakermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹

Arora

Mickelson

Helmers

et al. 2010

J American Water Resour Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arora, Kapil, Steven K. Mickelson, Matthew J. Helmers, and James L. Baker, 2010. Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 46(3):618‐647. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2010.00438.x Abstract: Review of the published results shows that the retention of the two pesticide carrier phases (runoff volume and sediment mass) influences pesticide mass transport through buffer strips. Data averaged across different studies showed that the buffer strips retained 45% of runoff volume (ranging between 0 and 100%) and 76% of sediment mass (ranging between 2 and 100%). Sorption (soil sorption coefficient, Koc) is one key pesticide property affecting its transport with the two carrier phases through buffer strips. Data from different studies for pesticide mass retention for weakly (Koc < 100), moderately (100 < Koc < 1,000), and strongly sorbed pesticides (Koc > 1,000) averaged (with ranges) 61 (0‐100), 63 (0‐100), and 76 (53‐100) %, respectively. Because there are more data for runoff volume and sediment mass retention, the average retentions of both carrier phases were used to calculate that the buffer strips would retain 45% of weakly to moderately sorbed and 70% of strongly sorbed pesticides on an average basis. As pesticide mass retention presented is only an average across several studies with different experimental setups, the application of these results to actual field conditions should be carefully examined.

show abstract

Section: Arora Mickelson Helmers and Bakersupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Estimating Average Pesticide Mass Retention (%) In Buffer Stmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Arora Mickelson Helmers and Bakermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹

Arora

Mickelson

Helmers

et al. 2010

J American Water Resour Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies concluded that the infiltration capacity of grassed buffer strips is higher than that of arable land. Runoff reinfiltration in GBSs and GWWs is however very variable (10-91%), depending on the experimental conditions and the rainfall characteristics (Mersie et al, 2003;Le Bissonnais et al, 2004;Vianello et al, 2005). GWWs are generally wider than GBSs and are installed in thalwegs.…”

Section: Runoff Generation On Grassed Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seasonal evolution of runoff generation on agricultural land in the Belgian loess belt and implications for muddy flood triggering

Evrard

Vandaele

Bielders

et al. 2007

Earth Surf Processes Landf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muddy floods due to agricultural runoff are a widespread and frequent phenomenon in the European loess belt, and particularly in central Belgium. These floods are triggered when high quantities of runoff are generated on cropland and cause severe erosion. Three soil surface characteristics are relevant to determine the runoff potential of cultivated soils: soil cover by crops and residues, soil surface crusting and roughness. These characteristics have been observed on 65 cultivated fields throughout 2005. A heavy rainfall event representative for events triggering muddy floods in the region (60 mm h − − − − −1 during 30 minutes) has been simulated using a 0·5 m 2 simulator on fields with the 17 most observed combinations of soil surface characteristics in central Belgium. Runoff is not observed in the case of (ploughed) bare uncrusted soils, nor in the case of soils covered by crops showing a transitional crust and a moderate roughness (1-2 cm). In the cases where runoff has been observed, mean runoff coefficients ranged from 13% (wheat in July) to 58% (sugar beet or maize in May and June). Grassed buffer strips (GBSs) and grassed waterways (GWWs) show a higher runoff coefficient (62% for GBSs and 73% for GWWs) than most cultivated soils (13 -58%). Furthermore, it is demonstrated that small plot measurements can be used to estimate runoff generation at the field scale. A classification of runoff generation risk based on the surveys of soil surface characteristics has been applied to common crops of central Belgium. February as well as the period between May and September are the most critical for runoff at the field scale. However, it appears from monitoring of a 16 ha catchment that the highest runoff volumes and peak discharges are recorded between May and August after heavy rainfall, explaining why 85% of muddy floods are recorded during this period in central Belgium.was stored in colluvial deposits mainly located in dry zero-order valley bottoms, muddy floods are the mostly likely process carrying sediments from the dry valleys and transporting them to the flood plains.Nowadays, these floods occur when large amounts of runoff are generated on crusted cultivated soils. Mean rainfall depths required to trigger muddy floods are lower in May and June (25 ± 12 mm) than between July and September (46 ± 20 mm; Evrard et al., 2007a). Runoff and erosion are mainly produced in spring and early summer on fields with summer crops at an early development stage (Vandaele and Poesen, 1995). Processes such as slaking of aggregates, raindrop impact, microcracking and physico-chemical dispersion lead to the formation of a soil crust (Bresson and Boiffin, 1990). Several stages of crust development have been characterized. First, a structural crust is formed by local rearrangement of particles. Then, when particles are transported and deposited further away, a depositional crust can be observed (Valentin and Bresson, 1992). Crust development reduces the infiltration capacity as well as surface roughness. Oriented roughness des...

show abstract

“…Endosulfan (6,7,8,9,10,10‐Hexachloro‐1,5,5a,6,9,9a‐hexahydro‐ 6,9‐methano‐2,4,3‐benzodioxathiepine‐3‐oxide), an organochlorine, is widely used in agriculture as well as in integrated agriculture‐aquaculture farming systems to protect important food crops (Dong et al., ; Piazza et al., ). According to the USA environmental protection agency (EPA), endosulfan has deleterious effects on the health of aquatic organisms at concentrations above 0.22 μ g L − 1 (acute) and 0.056 μ g L − 1 (chronic) (Mersie et al., ). Following its classification in Annex A of Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutant, it will be withdrawn from the global market by 2020 (Dong et al., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of endosulfan onP4501A gene expression, antioxidant enzymes activity and histopathological alterations in liver of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicusBorodin, 1987)

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The effects of 14 days exposure to sublethal concentrations of endosulfan (10 and 40 μg L−1) were investigated in mRNA‐ P450 1A expression, antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT) activity and histopathological alterations of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) fingerlings with weights of 3–5 g. The results illustrated that the relative mRNA‐ P450 1A expression level significantly increased (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Highest significant increase (P < 0.05) was observed on the first day, then decreased towards day 14 of exposure. The SOD and CAT activity showed a significant increase in fish exposed to different concentrations up to day 7, then activity decreased on day 14 in fish of all treated groups. Although signs of tissue lesions were observed on day 4, they increased from day 7 and reached the highest level on day 14. The magnitude of all changed studied parameters (gene expression, enzymes and histopathological) follows a concentration‐dependent manner.

show abstract

Abating endosulfan from runoff using vegetative filter strips: the importance of plant species and flow rate

Cited by 55 publications

References 14 publications

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹

Seasonal evolution of runoff generation on agricultural land in the Belgian loess belt and implications for muddy flood triggering

The effects of endosulfan onP4501A gene expression, antioxidant enzymes activity and histopathological alterations in liver of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicusBorodin, 1987)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Abating endosulfan from runoff using vegetative filter strips: the importance of plant species and flow rate

Cited by 55 publications

References 14 publications

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff1

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff1

Seasonal evolution of runoff generation on agricultural land in the Belgian loess belt and implications for muddy flood triggering

The effects of endosulfan onP4501A gene expression, antioxidant enzymes activity and histopathological alterations in liver of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicusBorodin, 1987)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹

Review of Pesticide Retention Processes Occurring in Buffer Strips Receiving Agricultural Runoff¹