“…Colombia’s experience reinforces the argument that strategic litigation is most effective when there is an existing rights framework, an independent and knowledgeable judiciary, civil society capacity to frame social problems as rights problems and litigate, and a network able to support and leverage opportunities created by litigation 7. These conditions can be met alone or, as in Michigan, in tandem with referendum campaigns, taking into account that in some contexts, such as Colombia, referendums have been a tool traditionally proposed by anti-rights sectors.…”