2016
DOI: 10.1363/48e8516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion Stigma: A Systematic Review

Abstract: More research, using validated measures, is needed to enhance understanding of abortion stigma and thereby reduce its impact on affected individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
185
2
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
185
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Stigma has been theoretically applied to many social and biological conditions, and a growing body of recent research has attempted to conceptualize as well as measure abortion stigma (Cockrill, Upadhyay, Turan, & Foster, 2013;Cockrill & Nack, 2013;Cowan, 2017;Hanschmidt, Linde, Hilbert, Riedel-Heller, & Kersting, 2016;Kumar, Hessini, & Mitchell, 2009;Major & Gramzow, 1999;Norris et al, 2011;Shellenberg & Tsui, 2012) Major and Gramzow (1999) were the first to describe how the concept of stigma could be applied to the process of coping with the abortion experience, finding negative mental health impacts from concealing an abortion from others and from suppressing thoughts about it internally. Kumar et al (2009) further developed these ideas to understand the formation of abortion stigma, labeling it as multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, and operating on many different societal levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stigma has been theoretically applied to many social and biological conditions, and a growing body of recent research has attempted to conceptualize as well as measure abortion stigma (Cockrill, Upadhyay, Turan, & Foster, 2013;Cockrill & Nack, 2013;Cowan, 2017;Hanschmidt, Linde, Hilbert, Riedel-Heller, & Kersting, 2016;Kumar, Hessini, & Mitchell, 2009;Major & Gramzow, 1999;Norris et al, 2011;Shellenberg & Tsui, 2012) Major and Gramzow (1999) were the first to describe how the concept of stigma could be applied to the process of coping with the abortion experience, finding negative mental health impacts from concealing an abortion from others and from suppressing thoughts about it internally. Kumar et al (2009) further developed these ideas to understand the formation of abortion stigma, labeling it as multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, and operating on many different societal levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abortion-related stigma stems from the challenges abortion presents to social, cultural and religious beliefs 39 40. This stigma permits myths about abortion to propagate, can lead to shame and harassment and, particularly in countries where abortion is illegal or restricted, can be a barrier to women accessing high-quality PAC services 2 39 40. Inconsistencies in service provision across various provider facilities (government/public, non-government and private) has also been found to create barriers to access to contraception and SRH information post-abortion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kumar, Hessini, and Mitchell 2009, 628) Abortion stigma works to produce widespread silence and secrecy around abortion; many women perceive that if their abortion were to become known to various groups (family, friends, work communities, religious communities, and so on), then they would be looked down upon, labeled evil or abnormal, and would likely experience discrimination. Subsequently, these women decide to keep their abortion procedures secret (Hanschmidt et al 2016).…”
Section: Abortion Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%