2021
DOI: 10.1161/circ.144.suppl_2.9115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract 9115: Determining Optimal Hemoglobin Transfusion Threshold for Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Introduction: Multiple randomized controlled trials have found that a conservative approach to transfusing critically ill patients reduces mortality, with current guidelines recommending a hemoglobin (HgB) transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL. However, little work has examined whether this transfusion threshold reduces mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 17 ] Heterogeneity of pooled data was calculated using I 2 . [ 18 , 19 ] Random-effects models were used due to the heterogeneity of study protocols unless included studies numbered fewer than 5, as recommended in the Cochrane Handbook. [ 20 , 21 ] Pooled risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for binary and continuous data respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] Heterogeneity of pooled data was calculated using I 2 . [ 18 , 19 ] Random-effects models were used due to the heterogeneity of study protocols unless included studies numbered fewer than 5, as recommended in the Cochrane Handbook. [ 20 , 21 ] Pooled risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for binary and continuous data respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for binary and continuous metrics respectively[ 38 - 40 ]. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 [ 41 , 42 ]. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%