2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abusive Supervision and Creativity: Investigating the Moderating Role of Performance Improvement Attribution and the Mediating Role of Psychological Availability

Abstract: The existing studies have indicated that abusive supervision affects creativity; however, the specific impact mechanism is still unclear due to the uncertain relationship between leadership and employee creativity. Based on the resource perspective, this study examines the influence of abusive supervision on creativity through psychological availability (PA) and the moderating of this mediation by performance improvement attribution (PIA). Based on a survey of 234 employees', the hypotheses have been tested an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(138 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing studies have mostly regarded psychological availability as a mediating factor with respect to the consequences of positive/negative workplace social interaction. 42,57,58 Consistent with the research conducted by Li and Tong (2021), 59 this study employed psychological availability as a moderating variable and found that the level of psychological availability not only affected employee improvisation but also had a tremendous influence on the indirect effect of empowering leadership on employee improvisation via challenge stress and hindrance stress.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Existing studies have mostly regarded psychological availability as a mediating factor with respect to the consequences of positive/negative workplace social interaction. 42,57,58 Consistent with the research conducted by Li and Tong (2021), 59 this study employed psychological availability as a moderating variable and found that the level of psychological availability not only affected employee improvisation but also had a tremendous influence on the indirect effect of empowering leadership on employee improvisation via challenge stress and hindrance stress.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Public Health 2021, 18, 12124 2 of 14 and a reduction of innovative behaviours. [7][8][9]. In the context of traditional Chinese culture in organizations, the occurrence of abusive supervision is more frequent [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abusive supervision can lead to negative psychological states and behaviours of employees, such as psychological distress, compulsory citizenship behaviors, resignation, and a reduction of innovative behaviours. [7][8][9]. In the context of traditional Chinese culture in organizations, the occurrence of abusive supervision is more frequent [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they are more motivated to do something outside of their job, such as voice behavior (Binyamin and Carmeli, 2010). Furthermore, studies have found that employees with high psychological availability contribute more to their work and innovate more (Wang et al, 2021a). They are more willing to participate in innovation work, whether they complete it alone or in collaboration with others (Byrne et al, 2016).…”
Section: Moderated Effect Of Psychological Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study investigates the psychological availability at the intra-individual level, which further analyzes the moderate role of psychological availability between supervisor helping behavior and thriving at work, and the mediating effect of thriving at work between supervisor helping behavior and voice behavior. Previous studies on psychological availability mainly regard it as an intermediary mechanism while few studies regard it as a situational variable (Wang et al, 2021a). For example, through psychological availability, Qian et al (2020) investigated the indirect effect of supervisor guidance behavior on employee knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%