2013
DOI: 10.1163/18760104-01003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating Court Proceedings with the Dutch Crisis and Recovery Act: Direct and Indirect Effects of Procedural Provisions

Abstract: In 2008 in response to the global economic crisis the Dutch government enacted the Crisis and Recovery Act, aimed at accelerating various projects to strengthening the Dutch economy. This act contained measures to expedite appeals, introduced a ‘relativity’-principle and limited judicial review. Our evaluation, two years after coming into force of the act, shows that the measures have a negligible effect on accelerating projects and that several side-effects can be identified. We conclude that some measures sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23.3(2) EPA). This provision on experimental projects builds upon Article 2.4 of the Crisisand Recovery Act (which came into force in 2010) dealing with innovative projects (Verschuuren, 2010;De Graaf et al, 2013). The scope of the criterion used to designate experimental projects under the EPA is much wider (Tolsma and De Graaf, 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Provision To Deviatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23.3(2) EPA). This provision on experimental projects builds upon Article 2.4 of the Crisisand Recovery Act (which came into force in 2010) dealing with innovative projects (Verschuuren, 2010;De Graaf et al, 2013). The scope of the criterion used to designate experimental projects under the EPA is much wider (Tolsma and De Graaf, 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Provision To Deviatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Th is decision is called a dependent decision on damages (onzelfstandig schadebesluit) because the decision on the damages was linked to the decision on the substance. 43 In line with the Judicial Division's jurisprudence in the Paul Krugerbrug case, the whole decision, including the decision on the substance, would otherwise be arbitrary. 44 Th e aff ected person had to lodge an appeal against that decision, and judges could set aside the unlawful decision in its entirety.…”
Section: Dutch Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 In line with the Judicial Division's jurisprudence in the Paul Krugerbrug case, the whole decision, including the decision on the substance, would otherwise be arbitrary. 44 Th e aff ected person had to lodge an appeal against that decision, and judges could set aside the unlawful decision in its entirety. 45 Otherwise, no compensation could be awarded.…”
Section: Dutch Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%