The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax 2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108569620.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability Judgments in Sign Linguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, in generative studies on both spoken and sign languages, data comes mainly from the intuitions of native speakers; i.e., from formal and informal acceptability judgements by native speakers and signers. The reliability of this method has been experimentally confirmed for both spoken languages (Schütze & Sprouse 2014;Sprouse et al 2018;Sprouse 2018) and sign languages (Kimmelman 2021). The experiments were designed in order to answer our research questions:…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in generative studies on both spoken and sign languages, data comes mainly from the intuitions of native speakers; i.e., from formal and informal acceptability judgements by native speakers and signers. The reliability of this method has been experimentally confirmed for both spoken languages (Schütze & Sprouse 2014;Sprouse et al 2018;Sprouse 2018) and sign languages (Kimmelman 2021). The experiments were designed in order to answer our research questions:…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%