2018
DOI: 10.20485/jsaeijae.9.4_186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of a Proactive Braking Intervention System by Elderly Drivers Using an Actual Vehicle

Abstract: To evaluate the acceptability by elderly drivers of a proactive braking intervention system, we conducted an experiment using an actual vehicle, which could control velocity autonomously, on a test track. After driving the experimental vehicle, the participants evaluated acceptability from various aspects by subjective questionnaires. From the results of 21 elderly drivers, we confirmed the following tendencies: partly negative evaluations for reactive factors, positive evaluations for comprehensive factors, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we implemented similar systems into a driving simulator (7) , and evaluated the acceptability through user tests. Next, we also implemented a similar system into an actual experimental vehicle (8) , and conducted the user test on a private test course. After that, we implemented Saito's system into the experimental vehicle, and conducted the field operation test on public roads (9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we implemented similar systems into a driving simulator (7) , and evaluated the acceptability through user tests. Next, we also implemented a similar system into an actual experimental vehicle (8) , and conducted the user test on a private test course. After that, we implemented Saito's system into the experimental vehicle, and conducted the field operation test on public roads (9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second questionnaires were existing ones which evaluated the characteristics of the participants. To be more precise, we used TMT-J [20], which is a Japanese version of the Trail Making Test [21], for evaluating the total ability regarding perception and recognition, DSQ [22] for evaluating the driving style via 18 questions, and WSQ [23] for evaluating the workload sensitivity via 38 questions. DSQ and WSQ were tested before Day 1 as a preliminary questionnaire.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%