2015
DOI: 10.1086/680340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of a Social Support Intervention for Re-entering Prisoners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on the current study findings and the previous feasibility and acceptability evaluation of Support Matters (Pettus‐Davis et al, ), we propose three ways to improve social support interventions like Support Matters. Our proposed improvements fall into the categories of dosage, targeted content, and motivational engagement strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Building on the current study findings and the previous feasibility and acceptability evaluation of Support Matters (Pettus‐Davis et al, ), we propose three ways to improve social support interventions like Support Matters. Our proposed improvements fall into the categories of dosage, targeted content, and motivational engagement strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Remarkably, the null findings of the outcomes were inconsistent with the experiences support partners, former prisoners, and practitioners who participated in Support Matters. A process evaluation of acceptability and feasibility of Support Matters was conducted and published in a prior paper (Pettus‐Davis et al, ). In that study, former prisoners and support partners reported a high level of satisfaction with Support Matters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, existing tests of social support interventions with releasing prisoners have provided little guidance regarding how to conduct RCTs to test interventions. Social support interventions are systematic activities designed to enhance the existing quality or functions of former prisoners' support systems with the aim of mobilizing support to reduce rates of reincarceration (Pettus-Davis et al, 2015). Because social support interventions actively engage support providers in the program, testing intervention effects can involve two samples that contribute significantly to RCT complexity.…”
Section: Social Support Interventions For Releasing Prisonersmentioning
confidence: 99%