2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-9383(99)00078-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibilité hiérarchique des groupes de présentation finie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we weaken the assumption "π is the fundamental group of a finite aspherical cell complex" to "π is finitely presented", then the same conclusion holds without the word "tangentially". Any manifold of constant sectional curvature has zero rational Pontrjagin classes [Ave70], hence, applying the Mayer-Vietoris sequence and the accessibility result of Delzant and Potyagailo [DP98] (reviewed in 2.5), we deduce the following. Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we weaken the assumption "π is the fundamental group of a finite aspherical cell complex" to "π is finitely presented", then the same conclusion holds without the word "tangentially". Any manifold of constant sectional curvature has zero rational Pontrjagin classes [Ave70], hence, applying the Mayer-Vietoris sequence and the accessibility result of Delzant and Potyagailo [DP98] (reviewed in 2.5), we deduce the following. Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The definition 2.9 and the theorem 2.10 are taken from [DP98]. I am grateful to Thomas Delzant for helpful discussions.…”
Section: Accessibility Over Virtually Nilpotent Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], Delzant and Potyagailo proved a very general strong accessibility result. They showed that any finitely presented group without 2-torsion admits a finite hierarchy over any family of "elementary" subgroups (see Definition 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Firstly, a hierarchy from [6] is over one fixed family of subgroups. For this result, however, we alternate between decomposing over finite subgroups and two-ended subgroups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To finish our historical discussion let us point out that the relative invariant T (G, E) allows one to prove the accessibility of a finitely presented group G without 2-torsion over elementary subgroups [DePo1]. Using these methods it was shown recently that for hyperbolic groups without 2-torsion any canonical hierarchy over finite subgroups and one-ended subgroups is finite [Va].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%