2009
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Calibration Uncertainty in Phylogenetic Estimation of Evolutionary Divergence Times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
778
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 816 publications
(786 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(153 reference statements)
3
778
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this means that there are no hard upper constraints to divergence times which can lead to arbitrarily old age estimates (especially near the root of the tree) while the substitution rate takes on low values [64]. Even when each node has a prior age distribution associated with it, as is the case here, a more explicit prior on the age of root is desirable [64]. We therefore also ran analyses in which we placed a normally distributed prior on the age of the root node of the tree (which represents the divergence between Sphecidae and Crabronidae þ bees).…”
Section: (I) Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this means that there are no hard upper constraints to divergence times which can lead to arbitrarily old age estimates (especially near the root of the tree) while the substitution rate takes on low values [64]. Even when each node has a prior age distribution associated with it, as is the case here, a more explicit prior on the age of root is desirable [64]. We therefore also ran analyses in which we placed a normally distributed prior on the age of the root node of the tree (which represents the divergence between Sphecidae and Crabronidae þ bees).…”
Section: (I) Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous phylogenetic reconstruction and dating of the rbcL data set was performed using BEAST ver. 1.5.3 (Drummond and and employed a soft lower bound (see Yang and Rannala, 2006; also see Ho and Phillips, 2009) to constrain the divergence time between Liliaceae and Smilacaceae. This constraint was set using a lognormal distribution based on the age of Smilax wilcoxensis (offset 48.6, mean 52 and the 95% high probability density (HPD) 48.6-65 Ma, which covered the whole Paleocene and the early Eocene).…”
Section: Dating the Times Of Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fossil calibrating information was incorporated in the form of lognormal prior age distributions in line with the recommendations of Ho (2007) and Ho and Phillips (2009). Each of the fossil-based minimum clade ages was set as the zero offset of the lognormal distribution to represent the minimum bound.…”
Section: Beast Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%