2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accretion disc evolution in DW Ursae Majoris: A photometric study

Abstract: Abstract.We present an analysis of CCD photometric observations of the eclipsing novalike cataclysmic variable DW UMa obtained in two different luminosity states: high and intermediate. The star presents eclipses with very different depth: ∼1.2 mag in the high and ∼3.4 mag in the intermediate state. Eclipse mapping reveals that this difference is almost entirely due to the changes in the accretion disc radius: from ∼0.5R L 1 in the intermediate state to ∼0.75R L 1 in the high state (R L 1 is the distance from … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only nine SW Sex stars in the list of Rodríguez-Gil et al (2007) have eclipse depths above 2.0 mag, which are, however, lower than that of J0107. Two SW Sex stars, DW UMa (Stanishev et al 2004) and V1315 Aql (Papadaki et al 2009), have shown deeper eclipses of 3.2-3.4 mag, but only once and only within 2-3 days, whereas normally their eclipse depths are below 2.0 mag. Therefore, 2MASS J01074282+4845188 has the deepest permanent eclipse (at least during 11 months) among the known eclipsing nova-like variables.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only nine SW Sex stars in the list of Rodríguez-Gil et al (2007) have eclipse depths above 2.0 mag, which are, however, lower than that of J0107. Two SW Sex stars, DW UMa (Stanishev et al 2004) and V1315 Aql (Papadaki et al 2009), have shown deeper eclipses of 3.2-3.4 mag, but only once and only within 2-3 days, whereas normally their eclipse depths are below 2.0 mag. Therefore, 2MASS J01074282+4845188 has the deepest permanent eclipse (at least during 11 months) among the known eclipsing nova-like variables.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hump at φ ≈ 0.75-0.9 corresponds to the bright spot at the impact site of the accretion stream with the disk edge. This feature is not always seen in light curves of DW UMa, but it is also not without precedent (e.g., a similar pre-eclipse hump is present in several of the many DW UMa light curves shown in Stanishev et al 2004).…”
Section: X-ray and Optical Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each light curve consists of approximately two orbital periods of phase coverage that were folded on the orbital period of Stanishev et al (2004). An offset of +1650 s was applied to the times of the OM data (which were recorded as seconds after 1998.0 UTC in the Terrestrial Time system) so that the center of the observed eclipse coincided exactly with the nearest-in-time zero point (φ = 0.0) of the Stanishev et al (2004) ephemeris. The same time offset was applied to the PN data.…”
Section: X-ray and Optical Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) Patterson & Warner (1998), (2) Mason et al (2013), ( Skillman et al (1995), (25) Stanishev et al (2004), (26) Stanishev et al (2001), (27) Patterson (2001), (28) Kato & Uemura (2001), (29) Patterson et al (2005), (30) Retter et al (2003) Remarks: (a) shows also negative superhumps (b) possibly asynchronous rotation of the white dwarf (see more detail in the text) (c) possibly the remnant of a classical nova, observed on 101 December 30 (Patterson et al 2013) odicity could correspond to the spin of the magnetic white dwarf of this system that rotates nearly synchronously with the orbital revolution. However, it would be a very strange coincidence that the white dwarf rotation fits quite well the Stolz-Schoembs relation; we therefore believe that we could have a superhump also in this case.…”
Section: Rr Pic In Context With Other Superhumpersmentioning
confidence: 99%