Accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis in the whole slide images

Abstract

The rationale for choosing a remote quantitative method supporting a diagnostic decision requires some empirical studies and knowledge on scenarios including valid telepathology standards. The tumours of the central nervous system [CNS] are graded on the base of the morphological features and the Ki-67 labelling Index [Ki-67 LI]. Various methods have been applied for Ki-67 LI estimation. Recently we have introduced the Computerized Analysis of Medical Images [CAMI] software for an automated Ki-67 LI counting in the digital images.Aims of our study was to explore the accuracy and reliability of a remote assessment of Ki-67 LI with CAMI software applied to the whole slide images [WSI].The WSI representing CNS tumours: 18 meningiomas and 10 oligodendrogliomas were stored on the server of the Warsaw University of Technology. The digital copies of entire glass slides were created automatically by the Aperio ScanScope CS with objective 20x or 40x. Aperio's Image Scope software provided functionality for a remote viewing of WSI. The Ki-67 LI assessment was carried on within 2 out of 20 selected fields of view (objective 40x) representing the highest labelling areas in each WSI. The Ki-67 LI counting was performed by 3 various methods: 1) the manual reading in the light microscope - LM, 2) the automated counting with CAMI software on the digital images – DI , and 3) the remote quantitation on the WSIs – as WSI method. The quality of WSIs and technical efficiency of the on-line system were analysed. The comparative statistical analysis was performed for the results obtained by 3 methods of Ki-67 LI counting. The preliminary analysis showed that in 18% of WSI the results of Ki-67 LI differed from those obtained in other 2 methods of counting when the quality of the glass slides was below the standard range. The results of our investigations indicate that the remote automated Ki-67 LI analysis performed with the CAMI algorithm on the whole slide images of meningiomas and oligodendrogliomas could be successfully used as an alternative method to the manual reading as well as to the digital images quantitation with CAMI software. According to our observation a need of a remote supervision/consultation and training for the effective use of remote quantitative analysis of WSI is necessary.

The Use of Immunohistochemistry for Biomarker Assessment—Can It Compete with Other Technologies?

“…These programs are associated with an increasing number of publications that indicate quantitative morphometry is the equivalent of microscopic evaluation by conventional optical microscopy (Bernardo et al 2009;Lloyd et al 2011;Rojo, Bueno, and Slodkowska 2009;Słodkowska et al 2011).…”

The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects

“…The first was a Polish study (n = 28) that examined the accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis of tumors of the central nervous system using WSI. 87 The study assessed the accuracy and reliability of remote assessment of morphological features and the Ki-67 LI labeling index (an expression of nuclear antigen or cell proliferation) with computerized analysis of medical images (CAMI). The authors concluded that the results demonstrated that ''.the remote automated Ki-67 LI analysis performed with the CAMI algorithm on the whole slide images of meningiomas and oligodendrogliomas could be successfully used as an alternative method to manual reading as well as to digital images quantitation with CAMI software.''…”

Reduced angiogenic factor expression in intrauterine fetal growth restriction using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis

“…Several studies have published comparisons between semiquantitative scoring systems and digital analysis techniques for immunohistochemical staining . The accuracy of digital techniques including Aperio computer‐assisted analysis of immunohistochemical staining techniques has been assessed and validated in multiple tissue types including brain, breast and kidney . In published literature, Aperio PPCA is comparable with the pathologist's scoring and could add benefits of automated and reproducible measurement .…”