Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer

Olszewski, Raphaël; Szymor, Piotr; Kozakiewicz, Marcin

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.07.002

Cited by 51 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…suggested using the Coordinative Surveying Procedure (CSP) which is commonly used in the 3D industry because the accuracy of it is up to 1/1000 mm and can measure linear or non-linear surfaces. Meanwhile, in this research, a digital caliper is used for measurement, which only has an accuracy of 1/100 mm; it has already been used in research by Olszewski et al [9,2].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since there is no gold standard for the accuracy of 3D models, evaluation of measurement will be variative [9]. Nizam stated that measurement using a 3D model should be done using two measuring points that are far enough from each other, i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…more than 50 mm, so that the deviation could decrease further, and the final result will yield better accuracy [17]. Olszewski et al also suggest that deviation value should not be a parameter for accuracy in further research, but it can still be used if a correct and appropriate method is utilized for measurement [9].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several methods could be used to make a 3D model using selective laser sintering (SLS), 3D printing (3DP), FDM and PolyJet technologies [8,9]. FDM is one of the techniques used for 3DP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Three-Dimensional Model Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Models and Multislice Computed Tomography Scans

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare fabrication of commonly used three-dimensional (3D) models with original multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan data for accuracy and precision in reconstruction surgery.Methods: MSCT data from 10 samples are processed and manufactured to be 3D models. Both groups are then measured and analyzed for the purpose of comparison. Results:The average mandibular measurement difference between 3D models and MSCT scans is 0.26 mm more <2%. The final results of the comparison reveal high accuracy in 3D models compared to MSCT scan data. Conclusion:The 3D model could be considered as surgical guidance for maxillofacial reconstruction surgery since it yields highly accurate results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several methods could be used to make a 3D model using selective laser sintering (SLS), 3D printing (3DP), FDM and PolyJet technologies [8,9]. FDM is one of the techniques used for 3DP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Three-Dimensional Model Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Models and Multislice Computed Tomography Scans

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…이러한 기술로 3차원 시제품 제 작 등에 이용되고 있으며, 구체적으로는 전기 전자분야, 건축분야, 자동차산업, 조직공학 및 항공·우주분야 등에 활용되고 있다 [2][3][4] . 3D 프린팅의 대표적인 방식에는 SLA (stereolithography apparatus), FDM (fused deposition modeling), SLS (selective laser sintering)가 있으며 이외에도 3DP (three dimensional printing), LOM (laminated object manufacturing), 잉크젯 (inkjet) 등 다양한 종류가 현재 개발 중이다 [1,5,6] . 이를 이용한 출력 을 위해서는 우선적으로 CAD/CAM (computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing) 시스템을 이용하여 3차원 모델 링을 해야 하며 G-code로 변환해야 하는데 이때 사용되는 상용프 로그램은 Cura, Slic3r, KISSlicer 등 다양하게 있다 [7] .…”

Section: 서 론unclassified

A Study on the Comparison Mechanical Properties of 3D Printing Prototypes with Laminating Direction

Park¹,

Kim²,

Hong³

et al. 2015

Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article history:This paper summarizes the results of an investigation into the environmental factors that have an indirect impact on parts quality, as well as those process variables and modeling information that have a direct impact. The effects of strength, surface hardness, roughness, and accuracy of shape, that is, qualities that users generally need to know, were evaluated with laminating direction experimentally. The 3D printing methods used in this experiment were fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography apparatus (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), 3D printing (3DP) and laminated object manufacturing (LOM). The goal was to achieve a high standard of quality control and product quality by optimizing the fabrication process.

show abstract

3D Printing and Digital Processing Techniques in Dentistry: A Review of Literature

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the rapid development of 3D printing technologies lead to its new applications in the area of healthcare and medicine, including dentistry, orthopedics, cardiovascular, pharmaceutics, neurosurgery, engineered tissue models, medical devices, and anatomical models. Dentistry is widely acknowledged to benefit from 3D printing technologies due to its needs for the customization and personalization of dental products. In this review, the authors discuss and summarize various 3D imaging technologies and the recent advances of 3D digital processing techniques in dentistry in an effort to give a new perspective and greater understanding of the current development of 3D printing technologies in dentistry. It is anticipated that this review will explore why 3D printing is important to dentistry, and why dentistry motivates development in 3D printing applications. Further, current challenges and further perspectives are also discussed which helps researchers to optimize the 3D printing technology in dentistry, improve 3D printing strategies, and direct future dental bioprinting and translational applications.

show abstract

Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer

Cited by 51 publications

References 9 publications

Three-Dimensional Model Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Models and Multislice Computed Tomography Scans

Three-Dimensional Model Printing in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Models and Multislice Computed Tomography Scans

A Study on the Comparison Mechanical Properties of 3D Printing Prototypes with Laminating Direction

3D Printing and Digital Processing Techniques in Dentistry: A Review of Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About