2021
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202107.0075.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Epigenetic Aging in Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus), an Essential Step in the Conservation of at-Risk Dolphins.

Abstract: Epigenetics, specifically DNA methylation, allows for estimation of animal age from blood or remotely sampled skin. This multi tissue epigenetic aging clock uses 110 longitudinal samples from 34 Navy bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), identifying 195 cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites associated with chronological aging via leave-one-individual-out-cross-validation (R2=0.95). With a median absolute error of 2.5 years this clock improves age estimation capacity in wild dolphins, expanding conservation effo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study presents a robust and accurate ( r = 0.86, MAE = 2.1) epigenetic clock for the aging of Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphins based on skin tissue. To date, five other epigenetic clocks exist for odontocetes, using skin and/or blood samples: three for common bottlenose dolphins (Barratclough et al, 2021; Beal et al, 2019; Robeck, Fei, Haghani, et al, 2021), one for belugas (Bors et al, 2021), and one multi‐species odontocete clock, which was cross‐validated with nine species (Robeck, Fei, Lu, et al, 2021). While Beal et al (2019) used a pyrosequencing approach based on 13 CpG sites correlated with age, the remaining clocks were built using the HorvathMammalMethylChip40 with 37,492 CpG sites, as we did here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study presents a robust and accurate ( r = 0.86, MAE = 2.1) epigenetic clock for the aging of Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphins based on skin tissue. To date, five other epigenetic clocks exist for odontocetes, using skin and/or blood samples: three for common bottlenose dolphins (Barratclough et al, 2021; Beal et al, 2019; Robeck, Fei, Haghani, et al, 2021), one for belugas (Bors et al, 2021), and one multi‐species odontocete clock, which was cross‐validated with nine species (Robeck, Fei, Lu, et al, 2021). While Beal et al (2019) used a pyrosequencing approach based on 13 CpG sites correlated with age, the remaining clocks were built using the HorvathMammalMethylChip40 with 37,492 CpG sites, as we did here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi‐species clocks effectively estimate age and sex of individual members of various species simultaneously and, thus, facilitate conservation efforts by enabling the investigation of population viability of multiple species with a single tool (Robeck, Fei, Lu, et al, 2021). Nevertheless, accuracy of age predictions can be improved with species‐specific clocks (Field et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2019), several of which currently exist for odontocetes, including belugas (Bors et al, 2021) and common bottlenose dolphins (Barratclough et al, 2021; Beal et al, 2019; Robeck, Fei, Haghani, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported on epigenetic clocks for cetacean species, including humpback whales (Polanowski et al 2014; Beal et al 2019; Bors et al 2020; Tanabe et al 2020; Barratclough et al 2021; Robeck et al 2021). In prior work on humpback whales (Polanowski et al 2014), CpG sites were selected for based on their association with age in other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several DNA methylation-based age predictors, referred to as epigenetic clocks, have been developed for humans, mice and other mammals (Bocklandt et al 2011; Hannum et al 2013; Horvath 2013). Epigenetic clocks have also been developed for several cetacean species, including minke whales, Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Tanabe et al 2020), humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae (Polanowski et al 2014), bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus (Beal et al 2019; Barratclough et al 2021; Robeck et al 2021), beluga whales, Delphinapterus leucas (Bors et al 2020), and more generally odontocetes (Robeck et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in DNA methylation are linked to age‐related mechanisms and developmental milestones that often result in changes in gene expression (Gladyshev, 2016 ; Hannum et al, 2013 ; López‐Otín et al, 2013 ). Although largely focused on mammalian species (Barratclough et al, 2021 ; Beal et al, 2019 ; Bors et al, 2021 ; Fei et al, 2021 ; Horvath & Raj, 2018 ; Polanowski et al, 2014 ; Robeck et al, 2021 ; Stubbs et al, 2017 ; Tanabe et al, 2020 ), accurate clocks have been developed for other taxa including birds and fishes (Anastasiadi & Piferrer, 2020 ; De Paoli‐Iseppi et al, 2019 ; Mayne et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%