Acquired Hemophilia A Causing Delayed Splenic Rupture in a Patient after Diagnostic Colonoscopy

Lakha, Asif; Qazi, Baseer

doi:10.14309/00000434-201210001-01369

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…138 publications (7 case series and 131 singular case reports) were included of 163 individual patients treated primarily with splenectomy for splenic laceration after colonoscopy 11,14,15,17–19,31,33,34,40,42,45,50,52–176 . Individual patient data are shown in Supplementary Table and presented in comparison to SAE and splenorrhaphy in Table 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Splenic artery embolisation for splenic injury during colonoscopy: A systematic review

Lukies,

Clements

2023

UEG Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSplenic injury due to colonoscopy is rare, but has high mortality. While historically treated conservatively for low‐grade injuries or with splenectomy for high‐grade injuries, splenic artery embolisation is increasingly utilised, reflecting modern treatment guidelines for external blunt trauma. This systematic review evaluates outcomes of published cases of splenic injury due to colonoscopy treated with splenic artery embolisation.MethodsA systematic review was performed of published articles concerning splenic injury during colonoscopy treated primarily with splenic artery embolisation, splenectomy, or splenorrhaphy from 1977 to 2022. Datapoints included demographics, past surgical history, indication for colonoscopy, delay to diagnosis, treatment, grade of injury, splenic artery embolisation location, splenic preservation (salvage), and mortality.ResultsThe 30 patients treated with splenic artery embolisation were of mean age 65 (SD 9) years and 67% female, with 83% avoiding splenectomy and 6.7% mortality. Splenic artery embolisation was proximal to the splenic hilum in 81%. The 163 patients treated with splenectomy were of mean age 65 (SD 11) years and 66% female, with 5.5% mortality. Three patients treated with splenorrhaphy of median age 60 (range 59–70) years all avoided splenectomy with no mortality. There was no difference in mortality between splenic artery embolisation and splenectomy cohorts (p = 0.81).ConclusionsSplenic artery embolisation is an effective treatment option in splenic injury due to colonoscopy. Given the known benefits of splenic salvage compared to splenectomy, including preserved immune function against encapsulated organisms, low cost, and shorter hospital length of stay, embolisation should be incorporated into treatment pathways for splenic injury due to colonoscopy in suitable patients.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%