Acquired Weakness, Handgrip Strength, and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Ali, Naeem; O’Brien, James M.; Hoffmann, Stephen; Phillips, Gary; Garland, Allan; Finley, James C. W.; Almoosa, Khalid F.; Hejal, Rana; Wolf, Karen; Lemeshow, Stanley; Connors, Alfred F.; Marsh, Clay B.

doi:10.1164/rccm.200712-1829oc

Cited by 625 publications

(569 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

514

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Eleven out of the 29 (38%) 25,28,29,32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] observational studies were graded of low quality, 17 out of 29 (59%) 12,[14][15][16]20,24,26,27,30,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] as medium and one (3%) 51 as high quality. There were four RCTs included; two studies were deemed of low risk, 22,23 one unclear risk 8 and one with high risk 31 of bias.…”

Section: Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The incidence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndromes: A systematic review

Appleton

Kinsella

Quasim

2014

Journal of the Intensive Care Society

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We conducted a literature review of the intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndromes (critical illness polyneuropathy, critical illness myopathy and critical illness neuromyopathy) with the primary objective of determining their incidence as a combined group. Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database and article reference list searches and were included if they evaluated the incidence of one or more of these conditions in an adult intensive care unit population. The incidence of an intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndrome in the included studies was 40% (1080/2686 patients, 95% confidence interval 38-42%). The intensive care unit populations included were heterogeneous though largely included patients receiving mechanical ventilation for seven or more days. Additional prespecified outcomes identified that the incidence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness varied with the diagnostic technique used, being lower with clinical (413/1276, 32%, 95% CI 30-35%) compared to electrophysiological techniques (749/1591, 47%, 95% CI 45-50%). Approximately a quarter of patients were not able to comply with clinical evaluation and this may be responsible for potential underreporting of this condition.

show abstract

Section: Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The incidence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndromes: A systematic review

Appleton

Kinsella

Quasim

2014

Journal of the Intensive Care Society

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Malnutrition progresses due to catabolic processes, increasing susceptibility to infection and resulting in a deterioration of physiological function. Then, it leads to an increase in the frequency of infections, duration of ventilation, the length of hospital stay, and mortality rate 285. Appropriate nutritional intervention has been demonstrated to control these vital reactions and improve prognosis 286…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

Nishida

Ogura

Egi

et al. 2018

Acute Medicine & Surgery

158

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and PurposeThe Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG 2016), a Japanese‐specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in February 2017 in Japanese. An English‐language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese‐language version.MethodsMembers of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine were selected and organized into 19 committee members and 52 working group members. The guidelines were prepared in accordance with the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) creation procedures. The Academic Guidelines Promotion Team was organized to oversee and provide academic support to the respective activities allocated to each Guideline Creation Team. To improve quality assurance and workflow transparency, a mutual peer review system was established, and discussions within each team were open to the public. Public comments were collected once after the initial formulation of a clinical question (CQ), and twice during the review of the final draft. Recommendations were determined to have been adopted after obtaining support from a two‐thirds (>66.6%) majority vote of each of the 19 committee members.ResultsA total of 87 CQs were selected among 19 clinical areas, including pediatric topics and several other important areas not covered in the first edition of the Japanese guidelines (J‐SSCG 2012). The approval rate obtained through committee voting, in addition to ratings of the strengths of the recommendation and its supporting evidence were also added to each recommendation statement. We conducted meta‐analyses for 29 CQs. Thirty seven CQs contained recommendations in the form of an expert consensus due to insufficient evidence. No recommendations were provided for 5 CQs.ConclusionsBased on the evidence gathered, we were able to formulate Japanese‐specific clinical practice guidelines that are tailored to the Japanese context in a highly transparent manner. These guidelines can easily be used not only by specialists, but also by non‐specialists, general clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, clinical engineers, and other healthcare professionals.

show abstract

“…23,26 In this context, the manual dynamometer is a useful tool for identifying patients with muscular weakness, as it presents a correlation with overall muscular strength, as well as a correlation with mortality. 2,3,27 It is important to note that strength deficit is not the only determinant of worsening physical performance, as there are other systems involved. 22 The study has some limitations such as the fact that it is a cross-sectional study, therefore making it impossible to associate the evaluation of these variables over time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Existe associação entre massa e força muscular esquelética em idosos hospitalizados?

Martinez

Ramos²,

Oliveira³

et al. 2016

Rev. bras. geriatr. gerontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The variables mass and skeletal muscle strength contribute to the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Objective: To evaluate the association between strength and skeletal muscle mass in hospitalized elderly persons. Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a private hospital in the city of Salvador in Bahia. The study included individuals ≥60 years during their first and fifth day of hospitalization and who were neither sedated nor had taken vasoactive drugs. Muscle mass was calculated using an anthropometric equation and force was measured through handgrip strength. Muscle weakness was identified as <20 kgf for women and <30 kgf for men, and reduced muscle mass was when the muscle mass index was ≤8.9 kg/m 2 for men and ≤6.37 kg/m 2 for women. The Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between mass and strength and the accuracy of using mass to predict strength. Results: In 110 patients included, there was a moderate correlation between mass and strength (R=0.691; p=0.001). However, the accuracy of using mass to predict muscle strength was low (accuracy=0.30; CI 95% = 0.19-0.41; p=0.001). The elderly patients with muscle weakness were older than those without muscle weakness, with no differences between the other variables. Conclusion: There is a linear relation between skeletal muscle mass and strength, but mass did not predict strength, which suggests that the two measures continue to perform independently.

show abstract

Acquired Weakness, Handgrip Strength, and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Abstract: ICUAP is independently associated with increased hospital mortality. Handgrip strength is also independently associated with poor hospital outcome and may serve as a simple test to identify ICUAP. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00106665).

Cited by 625 publications

References 33 publications

The incidence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndromes: A systematic review

The incidence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness syndromes: A systematic review

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016 (J‐SSCG2016)

Existe associação entre massa e força muscular esquelética em idosos hospitalizados?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About