2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2009.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders’ stories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…F4, in which the used modeling language must be adequate for the intended target group and appropriate for the aim of modeling, has been instantiated for the target group of operative people without conceptual modeling experiences, as is required for the present instantiation of the CoMPArE articulation scheme. The modeling language has been designed to represent concrete work cases, as evidence in existing research (e.g., Kabicher and Rinderle-Ma 2011;Lai et al 2014;Santoro et al 2010) shows that people inexperienced in conceptual modeling are better capable to develop an understanding of the concepts necessary to describe a work process in this way. To make the notation more accessible for inexperienced modelers, it was limited to three elements with generic semantics suitable to model collaborative work processes.…”
Section: Fulfillment Of Required Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F4, in which the used modeling language must be adequate for the intended target group and appropriate for the aim of modeling, has been instantiated for the target group of operative people without conceptual modeling experiences, as is required for the present instantiation of the CoMPArE articulation scheme. The modeling language has been designed to represent concrete work cases, as evidence in existing research (e.g., Kabicher and Rinderle-Ma 2011;Lai et al 2014;Santoro et al 2010) shows that people inexperienced in conceptual modeling are better capable to develop an understanding of the concepts necessary to describe a work process in this way. To make the notation more accessible for inexperienced modelers, it was limited to three elements with generic semantics suitable to model collaborative work processes.…”
Section: Fulfillment Of Required Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been research on process representation [17,34], process knowledge acquisition [37], processes for collaboration [36,4], integration [25,8,23]. In order to identify best processes for product development, Eppinger and his colleagues have developed various DSM (design structure matrix) based analytical models to optimize processes based on sequential and technical relationships among tasks (Epingger et al, 1994; [47].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A more recent research clearly separates informal elicitation work and its formalization [26]. The authors divided process representation in two phases, the fIrst one dedicated to elicit information from domain experts and the second phase sup porting transformation by technology experts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%