2004
DOI: 10.1080/02702710490512307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of Blending Skills: Comparisons Among Body-Coda, Onset-Rime, and Phoneme Blending Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence consistent with this pattern is evident in the common unit task in readers in our study, where codas and onsets were strongly favored over the larger head and rime units. However, our data also show that even in prereaders, small unit performance outstrips explicit rime identification skill, consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Cassady & Smith, 2004;Geudens & Sandra, 2003;Hulme et al, 2002;Savage & Carless, 2005a). Furthermore, a specific facility with initial and final consonant identification has been reported frequently (e.g., Stuart & Coltheart, 1988;Walton & Walton, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Evidence consistent with this pattern is evident in the common unit task in readers in our study, where codas and onsets were strongly favored over the larger head and rime units. However, our data also show that even in prereaders, small unit performance outstrips explicit rime identification skill, consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Cassady & Smith, 2004;Geudens & Sandra, 2003;Hulme et al, 2002;Savage & Carless, 2005a). Furthermore, a specific facility with initial and final consonant identification has been reported frequently (e.g., Stuart & Coltheart, 1988;Walton & Walton, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Uygulanan program sürecinde görüldüğü üzere araştırma sonuçlarına göre bu beceri geliştirilebilmektedir. Diğer araştırma sonuçları da verilecek eğitim ile okul öncesi çocuklarının ses birimi birleştirme becerisinin geliştirilebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır (Cassady ve Smith, 2004;Daly, Chafouleas, Persampieri, Bonfiglio ve LaFleur, 2004;Daly, Johnson ve LeClair, 2009;Oudeans, 2003;Suortti ve Lipponen, 2014;Tyler vd., 2014). Fakat yine de ses birimi birleştirme görevi ses birimi ayırt etme görevine göre beş ile yedi yaş arasındaki çocuklar için daha zor bir görevdir (Stahl ve Murray, 1994).…”
Section: Sonuç Ve Tartışmaunclassified
“…According to Mackay and Imai study (2006) the phonetic categories "used to produce and perceive L1 vowels and consonants develop through childhood and into adolescence (…) they are more likely to subsume L2 phonetic categories" (p. 178), which results in a blockage of the natural development of novel phonetic categories, in the L2 context. On the other hand, authors such as Cassady and Lawrence (2004) suggest that vowels are more difficult to process by the pre-readers (vowel hypothesis, p. 262). However, this does not occur with our participants because the difficulty states on the consonantal alliteration identification, which is modified by children to the vowel level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%