“…AVGPs have been shown to possess larger attentional resources and display more flexibility in how they distribute these resources over space, time or to objects, which allows them to adapt to task demands (for reviews see Green & Bavelier, ; Spence & Feng, ). Eye‐tracking studies provide a convergent view by documenting initial oculomotor capture effects that are similar in AVGPs and NVGPs, but swifter recovery in AVGPS when wrongly cued (Chisholm, Hickey, Theeuwes, & Kingstone, ; Chisholm & Kingstone, , ). Search studies using manual reaction times, detection rate or eye‐tracking concur to demonstrate that AVGPS outperform NVGPs in detecting targets among distractors with some studies directly documenting fewer attention shifts (saccades) to task‐irrelevant distractors (Castel, Pratt, & Drummond, ; Chisholm & Kingstone, , , ; Clark, Fleck, & Mitroff, ; Hubert‐Wallander, Green, Sugarman, & Bavelier, ; Mack, Wiesmann, & Ilg, ; but see for another view Heimler, Pavani, Donk, & van Zoest, ).…”