2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619273114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of contact-dependent antibacterial tRNase toxins by translation elongation factors

Abstract: Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a mechanism by which bacteria exchange toxins via direct cell-to-cell contact. CDI systems are distributed widely among Gram-negative pathogens and are thought to mediate interstrain competition. Here, we describe tsf mutations that alter the coiled-coil domain of elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) and confer resistance to the CdiA-CT EC869 tRNase toxin from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli EC869. Although EF-Ts is required for toxicity in vivo, our results indicate tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, E. coli producing BcpA-1-CT did not exhibit reduced viability, despite the likelihood that this polypeptide contains the toxic domain of BcpA-1. For some E. coli-type CDI systems, cytoplasmic "permissive factors" are required for activity of a delivered toxin within a target cell (32,36,37). A requirement for a toxicity-promoting factor specific to Burkholderia, or to BdAU0158, may explain the lack of toxicity of BdAU0158 BcpA-1-CT in E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, E. coli producing BcpA-1-CT did not exhibit reduced viability, despite the likelihood that this polypeptide contains the toxic domain of BcpA-1. For some E. coli-type CDI systems, cytoplasmic "permissive factors" are required for activity of a delivered toxin within a target cell (32,36,37). A requirement for a toxicity-promoting factor specific to Burkholderia, or to BdAU0158, may explain the lack of toxicity of BdAU0158 BcpA-1-CT in E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CDI system, non-immunity proteins in the recipient cell also participate in the bacterial competition outcome (Aoki et al, 2008(Aoki et al, , 2010Diner et al, 2012;Willett et al, 2015;Jones et al, 2017). For example, the CDI effector CdiA-CT EC93 utilizes recipient's outer membrane protein BamA and the inner membrane protein AcrB to enter the recipient cell (Aoki et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recipient cell, CdiA-CT EC536 binds to CysK to increase its thermostability and its tRNase activity (Johnson et al, 2016). Interestingly, this CysK.CdiA-CT EC536 complex mimics the CysK.CysE complex, which is typically formed during de novo cysteine biogenesis, with a higher binding affinity (Johnson et al, 2016;Jones et al, 2017). Other examples are the recipient elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) in activating the toxicity of CdiA-CT EC869 and CdiA-CT NC101 (Jones et al, 2017;Michalska et al, 2017), and the involvement of recipient PtsG in CdiA-CT 3006 and CdiA-CT NC101 entry (Willett et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the binding partner ensures that the toxin refolds efficiently after delivery into the cytoplasm. More recently, we have discovered that diverse CdiA-CT toxins from E. coli strains EC869, NC101 and 96.154 interact functionally with translation factors EF-Tu and EF-Ts (46). CdiA-CT EC869 specifically cleaves within the aminoacyl acceptor stem of tRNA Gln and tRNA Asn molecules and binds to EF-Tu with high affinity.…”
Section: Toxin Delivery and Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CdiA-CT EC869 specifically cleaves within the aminoacyl acceptor stem of tRNA Gln and tRNA Asn molecules and binds to EF-Tu with high affinity. Remarkably, the toxin only cleaves substrate in the context of tRNA•EF-Tu•GTP ternary complexes (46), suggesting that the interaction with EF-Tu is required for nuclease activity. Moreover, EF-Ts is required for toxin activity in vivo , though guanine nucleotide exchange activity per se is not required for the nuclease reaction.…”
Section: Toxin Delivery and Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%