1996
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.16.12.6937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of Different Stat5 Isoforms Contributes to Cell-Type-Restricted Signaling in Response to Interferons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10,12,32 Our data presented in this study suggest a novel mechanism for IFNg-mediated activation of PI3K, involving interactions between STAT5b, Gab2 and the Src kinase Fyn (summarized in Figure 9). Whereas STAT5b can be phosphorylated in monocyte and T-cell lines in response to IFNg, 33 here we show activation of STAT5, a previously undocumented activity of IFNg in intestinal epithelial cells. This STAT5 phosphorylation in response to IFNg was inhibited by use of the broad-spectrum JAK kinase inhibitor, AG490, and was also STAT1 dependent, being significantly reduced by STAT1-specific siRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…10,12,32 Our data presented in this study suggest a novel mechanism for IFNg-mediated activation of PI3K, involving interactions between STAT5b, Gab2 and the Src kinase Fyn (summarized in Figure 9). Whereas STAT5b can be phosphorylated in monocyte and T-cell lines in response to IFNg, 33 here we show activation of STAT5, a previously undocumented activity of IFNg in intestinal epithelial cells. This STAT5 phosphorylation in response to IFNg was inhibited by use of the broad-spectrum JAK kinase inhibitor, AG490, and was also STAT1 dependent, being significantly reduced by STAT1-specific siRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We do not know the functional implication of this finding, but several works have already described a discrimination of Stat5a and Stat5b activation after specific stimuli. In this sense, stimulation of the promonocytic U937 cells with IFN-␣ and IFN-␥ leads to tyrosine phosphorylation and transactivation of Stat5a but not Stat5b (Meinke et al, 1996). The same study reported that IFN-␥ did not activate either Stat5a or Stat5b in HeLa cells despite the expression of both Stat5 isoforms at similar levels (Meinke et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this sense, stimulation of the promonocytic U937 cells with IFN-␣ and IFN-␥ leads to tyrosine phosphorylation and transactivation of Stat5a but not Stat5b (Meinke et al, 1996). The same study reported that IFN-␥ did not activate either Stat5a or Stat5b in HeLa cells despite the expression of both Stat5 isoforms at similar levels (Meinke et al, 1996). Furthermore, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor stimulates Stat5a but not Stat5b activation in human peripheral-blood monocytes (Rosen et al, 1996), whereas the same stimulus in human neutrophils activates Stat5b and not Stat5a (AlShami et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Besides the canonical activation of STAT1, IFNγ induces activation of STAT5. 47 Given our findings of STAT5 as a regulator of miR-155 expression, it is tempting to speculate that STAT5 is also involved in IFNγ-mediated miR-155 expression. We looked for, but did not find, involvement of NFkB in miR-155 expression in malignant CTCL T cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%