2023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Pulmonary Edema After Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment: A Case Report Written With ChatGPT Assistance

Abstract: Acute pulmonary edema is a rare but severe complication of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. While patients with known cardiovascular problems may be able to withstand this therapy, rapid decompensation can still occur. Here, we present a case of a patient with known low ejection fraction and severe mitral regurgitation who developed acute pulmonary edema during the first hyperbaric treatment for a foot ulcer. This case highlights the importance of identifying patients that are high risk, such as those with moderate-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, several records mentioned the current problems regarding citation inaccuracies, insufficient references, and ChatGPT referencing to non-existent sources [ 23 , 26 ]. This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [ 29 , 49 , 50 ]. These case studies discouraged the use of ChatGPT, citing the lack of scientific accuracy, the limited updated knowledge, and the lack of ability to critically discuss the results [ 38 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, several records mentioned the current problems regarding citation inaccuracies, insufficient references, and ChatGPT referencing to non-existent sources [ 23 , 26 ]. This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [ 29 , 49 , 50 ]. These case studies discouraged the use of ChatGPT, citing the lack of scientific accuracy, the limited updated knowledge, and the lack of ability to critically discuss the results [ 38 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [ 29 , 49 , 50 ]. These case studies discouraged the use of ChatGPT, citing the lack of scientific accuracy, the limited updated knowledge, and the lack of ability to critically discuss the results [ 38 , 49 , 50 ]. Therefore, the ChatGPT generated content, albeit efficient, should be meticulously examined prior to its inclusion in any research manuscripts or proposals for research grants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Second, several records mentioned the current problems regarding citation inaccuracies, insufficient references and ChatGPT referencing to non-existent sources [26,31]. This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [40,41,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second, several records mentioned the current problems regarding citation inaccuracies, insufficient references and ChatGPT referencing to non-existent sources [26,31]. This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [40,41,49]. These case studies discouraged the use of ChatGPT citing lack of scientific accuracy, limited updated knowledge, and lack of ability to critically discuss the results [40,41,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was clearly shown in two recently published case studies with ChatGPT use in a journal contest [40,41,49]. These case studies discouraged the use of ChatGPT citing lack of scientific accuracy, limited updated knowledge, and lack of ability to critically discuss the results [40,41,75]. Therefore, the ChatGPT generated content albeit efficient should be meticulously examined prior to its inclusion in any research manuscripts or proposals for grants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%