2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADAM10: Biomarker of mild cognitive impairment but not of cognitive frailty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study reported a decrease in ADAM10 levels in PLTs associated with MCI and AD, suggesting that this reduction could serve as a potential biomarker for these conditions [138]. Similar findings were observed in both MCI and AD cases.…”
Section: The Role Of Platelets In Mild Cognitive Impairmentsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A study reported a decrease in ADAM10 levels in PLTs associated with MCI and AD, suggesting that this reduction could serve as a potential biomarker for these conditions [138]. Similar findings were observed in both MCI and AD cases.…”
Section: The Role Of Platelets In Mild Cognitive Impairmentsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A study showed that for individuals within a wide age range and particularly among the elderly, the platelet count gradually decreases with aging 41 . Another study found that thromboplastin and hormone metalloproteinase (ADAM10) levels may be associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and physical frailty, with platelet ADAM10 levels decreasing under conditions of MCI and physical frailty 42 . Therefore, we can hypothesize that a higher platelet count within the normal range is associated with a lower the risk of frailty in elderly patients with OSAS, and the speci c underlying pathophysiology needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study analyzed data from community-dwelling older adults (n = 88) aged 60 or more recruited from primary (e.g., family health units) and secondary (e.g., specialty centers) care services in a municipality of São Carlos/Brazil. This is a secondary analysis of a previously investigated population whose characteristics were described elsewhere [23][24][25]. Participants were divided into three different groups according to their neurocognitive status and classified as group 1: CU (n = 31), group 2: MCI (n = 27), and group 3: AD (n = 30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%