Adaptação cultural e validação do módulo Strategies to end seclusion restraint do ToolKit QualityRights

Zanardo, Ana Beatriz Rizzo; Ventura, Carla Aparecida Arena

doi:10.1590/1518-8345.5638.3553

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study from Brazil performed a translation and cultural adaptation of one of the training modules of the Initiative, initially, where the module was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluated by a committee of judges, experts in the subject, followed by the evaluation of mental health professionals, to ensure that the module, in addition to being translated, was also adapted to the local culture. Based on the positive results, the module was considered validated and adapted for Brazilian culture, according to the face and content, and can be used, aiming at the training of Brazilian health professionals (Zanardo & Ventura, 2022).…”

Section: Innovations On How To Use the Qualityrights Initiativementioning

confidence: 99%

The WHO QualityRights Initiative and its use worldwide: A literature review

Mion,

Ventura

2023

Int J Soc Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To subsidize and win the fight against the violation of the human rights of people with mental disorders, an international working group has built a toolkit of quality assurance services and the exercise of human rights by users, both in low-, middle, and high-income countries. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) QualityRights Initiative has been discussed and agreed upon by government entities in many countries in its use and implementation. The program includes a service assessment kit and training modules. Aims: In this context, this article aims to synthesize, from database searches, how the QualityRights Initiative is being used worldwide. Method: This is an integrative literature review, in which 354 articles were initially obtained. After analysis, 25 articles were included in this study. Results: The results show different ways of using the initiative: service evaluation; QualityRights Initiative service evaluation and training provision; innovations on how to use the QualityRights Initiative; and QualityRights Initiative trainings. Conclusions: As the first part of the initiative, the service assessment part, was launched before the training materials, most of the articles found (17) were using it. Despite the recent launch of the training part of the initiative, five articles were found to have already conducted the training. In addition, three articles reported on the use of the initiative in other ways, such as translation and cultural adaptation of the modules; updating the document in light of the QualityRights project; and assessing whether its implementation would be effective in reducing coercive practices.

show abstract

Section: Innovations On How To Use the Qualityrights Initiativementioning

confidence: 99%

The WHO QualityRights Initiative and its use worldwide: A literature review

Mion,

Ventura

2023

Int J Soc Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology

Oliveira,

Mion,

Batista

et al. 2024

Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To create and validate criteria for prioritizing problems related to policies and management of the health workforce. Methods. This methodological study was divided into three stages. First, the criteria were elaborated by means of a systematized literature review. Second, the criteria were evaluated online by a committee of judges comprised of eight specialists. In the third stage, an evaluation was carried out by the target audience in a hybrid workshop. The participants evaluated the material using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument, adapted for the research. Results. Three prioritization criteria (relevance, window of opportunity and acceptability) and a scoring scale were developed based on the literature review. In the evaluation by the committee of judges, the approval percentage of the criteria and prioritization method was 84%. Modifications were made based on suggestions in relation to the material presented to the specialists. In the pre-test stage, the approval percentage varied by item, with six of them reaching a maximum approval of 100% (corresponding to approximately 46% of the items), four reaching 92% and three achieving 83% each, indicating positive results. Conclusions. The developed criteria were considered valid for use in the context of policies and management in the area of human resources for health.

show abstract

Adaptação cultural e validação do módulo Strategies to end seclusion restraint do ToolKit QualityRights

Cited by 2 publications

References 34 publications

The WHO QualityRights Initiative and its use worldwide: A literature review

The WHO QualityRights Initiative and its use worldwide: A literature review

Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About